| 1 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
10 | NS |
3  | E |  10 | -4 |
400 | 10.35 |
| 1 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
11 | NS |
2  | W |  3 | = |
-120 | -2.73 |
| 1 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
12 | NS |
3  | N | 6 | = |
140 | 4.00 |
| 2 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
4 | EW |
3 | E | 4 | -3 |
300 | -5.90 |
| 2 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
5 | EW |
3 | S | J | +3 |
690 | -2.07 |
| 2 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
6 | EW |
4 | E | 5 | = |
-620 | 2.31 |
| 3 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
19 | NS |
1 | W | Q | +2 |
-140 | -0.87 |
| 3 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
20 | NS |
4 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 0.04 |
| 3 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
21 | NS |
1 | N | J | = |
90 | 2.67 |
| 4 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
2 | S | A | = |
110 | 0.53 |
| 4 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
3 | E | A | -1 |
50 | 2.44 |
| 4 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
2 | W | 8 | +1 |
-110 | 2.35 |
| 5 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
25 | EW |
1 | N | J | = |
70 | 0.90 |
| 5 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
26 | EW |
3 | E | 4 | +1 |
-630 | 9.20 |
| 5 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
27 | EW |
2 | S | 10 | +1 |
140 | 1.64 |
| 6 | 103: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
16 | NS |
3 | W | 2 | = |
-600 | 1.88 |
| 6 | 103: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
17 | NS |
2 | W | 5 | = |
-110 | -0.58 |
| 6 | 103: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
18 | NS |
1 | E | 2 | +1 |
-120 | -1.82 |
| 7 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
22 | NS |
4 | E | 2 | = |
-620 | 0.11 |
| 7 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
23 | NS |
2 | S | A | +2 |
180 | -0.38 |
| 7 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
24 | NS |
4 | N | 5 | = |
420 | 2.61 |
| 8 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
1 | EW |
4 x | W | 10 | -1 |
100 | -7.52 |
| 8 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
2 | EW |
4 | S | 5 | -3 |
-300 | 4.63 |
| 8 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
3 | EW |
3 | S | A | +1 |
130 | 5.40 |
| 9 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
7 | EW |
2 | N | 6 | = |
110 | -1.23 |
| 9 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
8 | EW |
2 | W | 7 | = |
-90 | -0.36 |
| 9 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
9 | EW |
4 | S | 7 | +1 |
450 | -2.56 |
