| 1 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4  | W |  5 | = |
-420 | -3.70 |
| 1 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
2 | NS |
4 | S | 10 | -3 |
-300 | -4.63 |
| 1 | 104: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
3 | NS |
4 | S |  A | = |
420 | 1.70 |
| 2 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
7 | NS |
2  | W | 10 | -3 |
300 | 5.99 |
| 2 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
8 | NS |
2 | W | 5 | +1 |
-140 | -1.39 |
| 2 | 111: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
9 | NS |
4 | S | 2 | -2 |
-100 | -9.36 |
| 3 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
13 | EW |
2 | N |  7 | +2 |
170 | -1.34 |
| 3 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
14 | EW |
2 | S | 10 | +1 |
140 | -0.32 |
| 3 | 107: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
15 | EW |
3 | W | 8 | = |
-110 | 2.35 |
| 4 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
19 | EW |
4 | W | 8 | -1 |
100 | -4.98 |
| 4 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
20 | EW |
5 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 3.88 |
| 4 | 105: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
21 | EW |
1 | N | J | = |
90 | -2.67 |
| 5 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
22 | NS |
4 | E | 7 | +2 |
-680 | -1.69 |
| 5 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
23 | NS |
3 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | -5.29 |
| 5 | 112: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
24 | NS |
4 | N | 5 | +2 |
480 | 4.12 |
| 6 | 109: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
16 | EW |
3 | W | 2 | = |
-600 | -1.88 |
| 6 | 109: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
17 | EW |
2 | W | 5 | = |
-110 | 0.58 |
| 6 | 109: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
18 | EW |
1 | E | 2 | +1 |
-120 | 1.82 |
| 7 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
4 | NS |
3 | W | Q | -2 |
200 | 3.63 |
| 7 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
5 | NS |
4 | S | 3 | +1 |
650 | 1.14 |
| 7 | 108: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
6 | NS |
4 | E | 6 | = |
-620 | -2.31 |
| 8 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
25 | EW |
1 | N | 5 | = |
90 | 0.18 |
| 8 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
26 | EW |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-600 | 8.60 |
| 8 | 110: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
27 | EW |
3 | S | 3 | = |
400 | -4.49 |
| 9 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
10 | EW |
3 | E | 10 | -3 |
300 | -9.09 |
| 9 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
11 | EW |
2 | S | A | = |
110 | -3.15 |
| 9 | 106: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
12 | EW |
3 | W | 2 | = |
-110 | 2.25 |
