| 1 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2  | S | | -3 |
-150 | 95.63 |
| 1 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | W | | +1 |
-130 | 31.69 |
| 1 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2  | S | | +1 |
140 | 36.50 |
| 1 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | S | | +2 |
460 | 4.63 |
| 1 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4  | N | | +3 |
710 | 78.61 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | E | | +1 |
-130 | 98.10 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | S | | +2 |
460 | 17.01 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 x | E | | -2 |
300 | 18.46 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2  | E | | +1 |
-140 | 82.01 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| EW |
2  | S | | +1 |
140 | 17.58 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| EW |
3  | S | | +1 |
430 | 11.54 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| EW |
4  | W | | +1 |
-150 | 47.56 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| EW |
4  | W | | -3 |
300 | 2.32 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| EW |
4  | E | | = |
-620 | 62.18 |
| 3 | 65: C. Biały - L. Regiel, 0.0, NZ/KP |
| NS |
4 x | W | | = |
-590 | 0.91 |
| 3 | 65: C. Biały - L. Regiel, 0.0, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3  | S | | +4 |
720 | 72.41 |
| 3 | 65: C. Biały - L. Regiel, 0.0, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3  | S | | -1 |
-50 | 36.76 |
| 3 | 65: C. Biały - L. Regiel, 0.0, NZ/KP |
| NS |
4  | E | | = |
-620 | 4.25 |
| 3 | 65: C. Biały - L. Regiel, 0.0, NZ/KP |
| NS |
5 x | E | | = |
-550 | 8.72 |
| 3 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
4  | S | | -1 |
-50 | 70.76 |
| 3 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
3  | S | | = |
600 | 34.74 |
| 3 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
3  | S | | +1 |
430 | 91.67 |
| 3 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
3  | E | | -3 |
300 | 40.86 |
| 3 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
4  | E | | +2 |
-680 | 23.37 |
| 3 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
2  | E | | -3 |
150 | 90.56 |
| 3 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3  | N | | +2 |
460 | 31.00 |
| 3 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
4  | N | | = |
620 | 29.97 |
| 3 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3  | E | | -2 |
100 | 86.44 |
| 3 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
2  | W | | -1 |
100 | 67.34 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
4  | S | | +1 |
450 | 83.89 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
3  | W | | +2 |
-460 | 35.60 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
3  | W | | +2 |
-660 | 62.27 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
3  | E | | +1 |
-130 | 63.56 |