| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4  | S | | -2 |
-100 | 68.14 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | N | | = |
600 | 65.26 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | S | | = |
140 | 32.69 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2  | S | | +1 |
140 | 66.32 |
| 1 | 64: M. Okrutny - Z. Leśniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4 | E | | +1 |
-650 | 42.30 |
| 1 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3 | S | | -1 |
-50 | 2.81 |
| 1 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3 | W | | +2 |
-460 | 64.40 |
| 1 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3 | W | | +2 |
-660 | 37.73 |
| 1 | 61: D. Kamiński - B. Manelski, 1.5, NZ/KP |
| NS |
3  | W | | +1 |
-130 | 36.44 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| NS |
2  | W | | = |
-90 | 32.78 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | W | | = |
-400 | 31.17 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| NS |
2 | S | | +1 |
140 | 63.50 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | S | | = |
140 | 61.18 |
| 2 | 66: A. Leśniewska - Z. Rychlik, 6.5, KP |
| NS |
6 | N | | +1 |
1470 | 89.30 |
| 2 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
4 | S | | +1 |
650 | 84.64 |
| 2 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
3 | S | | +2 |
460 | 82.99 |
| 2 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
3 | S | | = |
140 | 61.15 |
| 2 | 63: A. Borkowski - M. Piotrowski, 10.0, KP |
| NS |
1 | E | | +2 |
-140 | 17.99 |
| 3 | 67: K. Buchalski - S. Fabczak, 3.0, KP |
| EW |
4 x | W | | = |
-590 | 99.09 |
| 3 | 67: K. Buchalski - S. Fabczak, 3.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | | +4 |
720 | 27.59 |
| 3 | 67: K. Buchalski - S. Fabczak, 3.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | | -1 |
-50 | 63.24 |
| 3 | 67: K. Buchalski - S. Fabczak, 3.0, KP |
| EW |
4 | E | | = |
-620 | 95.75 |
| 3 | 67: K. Buchalski - S. Fabczak, 3.0, KP |
| EW |
5 x | E | | = |
-550 | 91.28 |
| 4 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4 x | E | | +1 |
-990 | 99.35 |
| 4 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | S | | +1 |
110 | 57.05 |
| 4 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 x | S | | = |
730 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 x | E | | = |
-750 | 98.84 |
| 4 | 62: P. Lisicki - P. Nadolski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | E | | +2 |
-170 | 26.67 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
2 | N | | = |
120 | 15.18 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
5 | S | | +1 |
420 | 89.28 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
4 | N | | +1 |
650 | 29.46 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
4 | E | | = |
-420 | 92.33 |
| 4 | 68: J. Adamski - J. Krajewski, 4.0, KP/NZ |
| EW |
3 | W | | -2 |
200 | 3.80 |
