| 1 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2  | S |  4 | -1 |
-50 | 4.21 |
| 1 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2  | S | 9 | -2 |
-200 | 84.04 |
| 1 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 6 | = |
420 | 65.05 |
| 1 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | N | 2 | -2 |
-200 | 98.40 |
| 1 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 4 | -3 |
150 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| NS |
6 x | E |  K | -4 |
800 | 100.00 |
| 3 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| NS |
3 | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 58.95 |
| 3 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| NS |
6 | W | 2 | -1 |
100 | 95.79 |
| 3 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| NS |
6 | E | A | = |
-980 | 47.89 |
| 3 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| NS |
4 | W | A | -1 |
50 | 58.95 |
| 4 | 82: T. Pawlak - T. Gawart, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | S | Q | +1 |
430 | 87.89 |
| 4 | 82: T. Pawlak - T. Gawart, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 23.16 |
| 4 | 82: T. Pawlak - T. Gawart, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 41.58 |
| 4 | 82: T. Pawlak - T. Gawart, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | W | 6 | = |
-1430 | 12.63 |
| 4 | 82: T. Pawlak - T. Gawart, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 6 | +1 |
630 | 31.58 |
| 5 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 7 | +1 |
630 | 48.40 |
| 5 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| EW |
5 x | N | A | -2 |
-300 | 97.23 |
| 5 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 5 | +2 |
660 | 1.67 |
| 5 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | Q | +1 |
-430 | 19.79 |
| 5 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 7 | = |
110 | 26.38 |
