| 2 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| NS |
2  | W |  K | +1 |
-140 | 68.42 |
| 2 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| NS |
6  | E | 9 | -2 |
200 | 76.84 |
| 2 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| NS |
5 x | S |  K | -3 |
-500 | 10.53 |
| 2 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | T | +3 |
-710 | 69.68 |
| 2 | 86: T. Olczyk - L. Piotrowski, 12.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | J | -1 |
100 | 57.06 |
| 3 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | S | Q | = |
590 | 90.00 |
| 3 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | T | = |
-110 | 33.16 |
| 3 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | T | = |
-620 | 71.58 |
| 3 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
6 | W | J | +1 |
-1010 | 14.21 |
| 3 | 83: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3  | E | J | -3 |
150 | 93.68 |
| 4 | 84: A. Kwiatkowski - A. Wypyszyński, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
3 | S | Q | +1 |
430 | 12.11 |
| 4 | 84: A. Kwiatkowski - A. Wypyszyński, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
4 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 76.84 |
| 4 | 84: A. Kwiatkowski - A. Wypyszyński, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 58.42 |
| 4 | 84: A. Kwiatkowski - A. Wypyszyński, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
6 | W | 6 | = |
-1430 | 87.37 |
| 4 | 84: A. Kwiatkowski - A. Wypyszyński, 4.0, -/MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 6 | +1 |
630 | 68.42 |
| 5 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| EW |
6 | S | 7 | = |
1370 | 6.39 |
| 5 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| EW |
4 | W | 8 | -3 |
300 | 34.07 |
| 5 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| EW |
3 | N | J | = |
600 | 30.78 |
| 5 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| EW |
5 | W | J | = |
-450 | 40.11 |
| 5 | 85: B. Jarota-Romaniuk - J. Romaniuk, 18.0, MA/PM |
| EW |
2 | N | T | -1 |
-50 | 64.83 |
