| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
5  x | N |  A | -3 |
-500 | 93.75 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
4 | E |  5 | = |
-420 | 30.00 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
4 | S | 4 | = |
420 | 33.75 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
1  | S | A | +1 |
120 | 25.00 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
1 | S | 3 | +1 |
120 | 55.00 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
6 | EW |
3 | E | 6 | +1 |
-630 | 56.41 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
3 | W | K | = |
-140 | 16.25 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
8 | EW |
3 | N | J | = |
400 | 35.00 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
1 | S | 7 | +1 |
120 | 33.75 |
| 1 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
4 | E | J | +1 |
-650 | 70.00 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
11 | EW |
2 | S | 4 | -2 |
-100 | 87.50 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
12 | EW |
3 | E | J | = |
-400 | 75.00 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
13 | EW |
4 | N | K | = |
620 | 36.25 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
14 | EW |
4 | W | K | +1 |
-450 | 68.75 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
15 | EW |
2 | E |  6 | = |
-110 | 38.75 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
16 | NS |
2 | S | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 5.00 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
17 | NS |
3 x | S | K | -4 |
-800 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
18 | NS |
5 x | S | K | -2 |
-500 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
19 | NS |
4 | W | 8 | = |
-620 | 77.50 |
| 2 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
20 | NS |
4 | W | T | = |
-620 | 31.25 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
21 | NS |
3 | N | T | = |
110 | 46.25 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
22 | NS |
3 | S | T | -2 |
-100 | 18.68 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
23 | NS |
1 | W | A | +1 |
-110 | 40.03 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
24 | NS |
3 | E | 9 | +1 |
-430 | 37.19 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
25 | NS |
3 | S | T | -3 |
-150 | 3.02 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
26 | NS |
6 | E | 6 | -1 |
100 | 92.71 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
27 | NS |
1 | E | 2 | = |
-90 | 44.31 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
28 | NS |
5 | N | 6 | = |
650 | 83.51 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
29 | NS |
3 | W | T | -2 |
200 | 69.71 |
| 3 | 84: M. Firgon - E. Kaczmarek, 9.0, PM/ZP |
30 | NS |
4 | E | J | = |
-420 | 48.03 |
