| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
1 | EW |
5  | E | A | +1 |
-420 | 81.25 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
2 | EW |
6  | E | 2 | -1 |
50 | 17.50 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
3 | EW |
4  | S | J | -2 |
-100 | 88.75 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
4 | EW |
2  | W | 4 | = |
-110 | 83.75 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
5 | EW |
2  | N | 2 | +1 |
110 | 70.00 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
6 | NS |
3  | E | 6 | +1 |
-630 | 43.59 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
7 | NS |
4  | W | K | = |
-620 | 28.75 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
8 | NS |
3  | N | J | +1 |
430 | 87.50 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
9 | NS |
2  | E | 3 | -2 |
200 | 76.25 |
| 1 | 83: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.5, ZP/- |
10 | NS |
4  | W | K | = |
-620 | 63.75 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
11 | NS |
2  | N | J | -2 |
-100 | 12.50 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
12 | NS |
4  | E | Q | -1 |
50 | 61.25 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
4  | N | K | = |
620 | 63.75 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
5  | W | K | = |
-450 | 31.25 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
2  | S | 7 | -2 |
-200 | 26.25 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
2  | S | 2 | +1 |
110 | 38.75 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
17 | NS |
3  | W | 9 | = |
-110 | 17.50 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
18 | NS |
4  | E | T | = |
-420 | 8.75 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
19 | NS |
4  | W | 3 | +1 |
-650 | 31.25 |
| 2 | 85: H. Pakuła - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
20 | NS |
4  | W | T | -1 |
100 | 86.25 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
21 | EW |
3  | N | T | = |
110 | 53.75 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
22 | EW |
3  | S | T | -2 |
-100 | 81.32 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
23 | EW |
1  | W | A | +1 |
-110 | 59.97 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
24 | EW |
3  | E | 9 | +1 |
-430 | 62.81 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
25 | EW |
3  | S | T | -3 |
-150 | 96.98 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
26 | EW |
6  | E | 6 | -1 |
100 | 7.29 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
27 | EW |
1  | E | 2 | = |
-90 | 55.69 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
28 | EW |
5  | N | 6 | = |
650 | 16.49 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
29 | EW |
3  | W | T | -2 |
200 | 30.29 |
| 3 | 86: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kondyjowski, 3.0, -/ZP |
30 | EW |
4  | E | J | = |
-420 | 51.97 |