| 1 | 295: L. Błaziński - M. Żakowicz, 24.0, ZP |
| NS |
4  | S | 8 | +1 |
650 | 75.00 |
| 1 | 295: L. Błaziński - M. Żakowicz, 24.0, ZP |
| NS |
1  | E | 4 | +4 |
-200 | 11.27 |
| 1 | 295: L. Błaziński - M. Żakowicz, 24.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | N | 2 | +1 |
630 | 89.44 |
| 2 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
2  | N | 5 | +3 |
200 | 72.89 |
| 2 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | N | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 46.07 |
| 2 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
4  | S | 6 | = |
620 | 75.35 |
| 3 | 287: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 7.5, ZP |
| NS |
2  | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 92.61 |
| 3 | 287: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 7.5, ZP |
| NS |
PASS | | | |
0 | 70.92 |
| 3 | 287: J. Dziemidowicz - S. Kamiński, 7.5, ZP |
| NS |
3  | S | 5 | -2 |
-200 | 33.45 |
| 4 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 x | S | 2 | = |
590 | 92.14 |
| 4 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 x | W | A | -3 |
800 | 100.00 |
| 4 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
6 x | E | Q | -4 |
800 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 289: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
4  | N | A | +1 |
450 | 83.10 |
| 5 | 289: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | S | T | -1 |
-100 | 43.31 |
| 5 | 289: E. Kaczmarek - C. Wojtaś, 14.0, ZP |
| NS |
7  | N | 3 | = |
1520 | 86.72 |
| 6 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2  | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 68.38 |
| 6 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | N | 6 | = |
600 | 98.91 |
| 6 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
4  | E | 3 | +2 |
-480 | 73.02 |
| 7 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | N | 6 | = |
400 | 46.13 |
| 7 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2  | E | 5 | = |
-110 | 29.08 |
| 7 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2  | N | 5 | = |
110 | 57.45 |
| 8 | 292: T. Mediuch - J. Kowalczyk, 0.5, ZP/- |
| NS |
5  | N | 5 | = |
600 | 81.69 |
| 8 | 292: T. Mediuch - J. Kowalczyk, 0.5, ZP/- |
| NS |
3  | W | 3 | -2 |
100 | 85.21 |
| 8 | 292: T. Mediuch - J. Kowalczyk, 0.5, ZP/- |
| NS |
2  | S | 2 | +2 |
130 | 61.97 |
| 9 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| NS |
4  | N | 7 | = |
620 | 60.56 |
| 9 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| NS |
4  | N | A | +2 |
480 | 92.96 |
| 9 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| NS |
4  | N | T | +1 |
450 | 93.97 |
| 10 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| NS |
2  | E | 6 | -2 |
200 | 97.52 |
| 10 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| NS |
2  | S | 9 | -1 |
-50 | 96.13 |
| 10 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| EW |
2  | E | J | +1 |
-140 | 77.46 |