| 1 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
1  | N |  5 | +1 |
120 | 95.39 |
| 1 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | W |  Q | +1 |
-450 | 75.00 |
| 1 | 288: F. Daniel - J. Antoniewicz, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | +1 |
-170 | 15.49 |
| 2 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
1 | E | 3 | +3 |
-180 | 14.79 |
| 2 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2 | W | 9 | = |
-120 | 47.16 |
| 2 | 290: J. Linkiewicz - B. Maryńczak, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
3 | W |  K | +2 |
-150 | 52.46 |
| 3 | 299: J. Schulz - K. Wiliński, 16.0, ZP |
| NS |
4 | S | 8 | +1 |
650 | 75.00 |
| 3 | 299: J. Schulz - K. Wiliński, 16.0, ZP |
| NS |
1 | E | A | +2 |
-140 | 63.03 |
| 3 | 299: J. Schulz - K. Wiliński, 16.0, ZP |
| NS |
5 | N | 8 | -1 |
-100 | 14.79 |
| 4 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| EW |
4 | S | 9 | = |
420 | 60.56 |
| 4 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| EW |
3 | E | K | -2 |
200 | 10.56 |
| 4 | 294: E. Kozak - M. Silski, 1.0, ZP/- |
| EW |
6 | N | Q | +1 |
1020 | 42.66 |
| 5 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | S | 2 | = |
420 | 21.79 |
| 5 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| EW |
2 | W | A | -2 |
200 | 14.79 |
| 5 | 296: S. Kietrys - L. Sulżycki, 14.0, ZP |
| EW |
3 | W | Q | +1 |
-430 | 81.34 |
| 6 | 300: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Mestl, 0.0, |
| EW |
2 | N | 9 | +1 |
140 | 72.18 |
| 6 | 300: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Mestl, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | E | 3 | -2 |
100 | 41.43 |
| 6 | 300: Z. Kwiatkowski - W. Mestl, 0.0, |
| EW |
5 | N | 5 | = |
600 | 33.93 |
| 7 | 297: W. Mateńko - B. Wiliński, 4.0, ZP/- |
| NS |
5 | N | 9 | -1 |
-100 | 19.01 |
| 7 | 297: W. Mateńko - B. Wiliński, 4.0, ZP/- |
| NS |
4 | N | 3 | +1 |
450 | 51.76 |
| 7 | 297: W. Mateńko - B. Wiliński, 4.0, ZP/- |
| NS |
4 | N | T | = |
420 | 67.02 |
| 8 | 298: K. Orzechowski - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
| EW |
5 | N | 5 | = |
600 | 18.31 |
| 8 | 298: K. Orzechowski - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | -2 |
100 | 14.79 |
| 8 | 298: K. Orzechowski - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
| EW |
2 | S | 2 | +2 |
130 | 38.03 |
| 9 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2 | E | 3 | +2 |
-130 | 36.41 |
| 9 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2 | N | T | = |
110 | 75.90 |
| 9 | 291: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
4 | E | 3 | +2 |
-480 | 73.02 |
| 10 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| EW |
3 | N | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 83.80 |
| 10 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | -1 |
50 | 58.16 |
| 10 | 293: B. Tomaszewski - J. Babiniec, 1.0, -/ZP |
| EW |
3 | N | 2 | -3 |
-150 | 97.16 |
