| 1 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| EW |
2  | W |  6 | +1 |
-150 | 42.50 |
| 1 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| EW |
4  | E | T | +1 |
-150 | 36.25 |
| 1 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| EW |
4  | S |  Q | = |
620 | 36.25 |
| 1 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | E | W | -3 |
150 | 1.25 |
| 3 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
4 x | S | K | -1 |
-100 | 25.66 |
| 3 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
1 | S | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 25.00 |
| 3 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
4 | W | T | -1 |
100 | 91.25 |
| 3 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
3 | W | 2 | +1 |
-630 | 46.25 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| NS |
5 x | N | A | -5 |
-1100 | 10.14 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| NS |
2 | W | 6 | -2 |
200 | 84.17 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | W | A | = |
-420 | 27.39 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| NS |
6 | S | 6 | = |
1440 | 79.90 |
| 4 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
3 | S | 6 | +3 |
690 | 20.00 |
| 4 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
3 | S | T | = |
400 | 8.75 |
| 4 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | N | T | +1 |
650 | 16.69 |
| 4 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | N | 6 | +1 |
450 | 52.50 |
| 4 | 90: E. Chodźko - J. Jermakowicz, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | E | K | +1 |
-430 | 91.25 |
| 4 | 90: E. Chodźko - J. Jermakowicz, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | N | 6 | = |
130 | 17.50 |
| 4 | 90: E. Chodźko - J. Jermakowicz, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | -1 |
-100 | 72.50 |
| 4 | 90: E. Chodźko - J. Jermakowicz, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | E | 1 | -2 |
100 | 40.00 |
| 6 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | W | J | = |
-600 | 47.44 |
| 6 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | -1 |
100 | 53.94 |
| 6 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | W | 8 | +4 |
-520 | 87.16 |
| 6 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | W | A | +2 |
-480 | 80.47 |
| 7 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | W | Q | -2 |
100 | 58.97 |
| 7 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | S | J | +1 |
650 | 75.63 |
| 7 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | W | A | = |
-140 | 29.50 |
| 7 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
3 | N | 2 | +2 |
660 | 67.08 |
