| 1 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| EW |
6  x | S |  Q | -3 |
-500 | 97.41 |
| 1 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| EW |
1 | S |  Q | = |
70 | 66.25 |
| 1 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | W |  T | = |
-620 | 63.75 |
| 1 | 87: J. Antoniewicz - Z. Kwiatkowski, 0.0, |
| EW |
5 | E | 1 | -1 |
100 | 3.75 |
| 2 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
4 | E | T | -1 |
100 | 78.19 |
| 2 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
2 | E | 7 | = |
-90 | 34.23 |
| 2 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
3  | W | T | +3 |
-490 | 34.63 |
| 2 | 89: M. Sankiewicz - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
| NS |
5 | W | A | = |
-450 | 41.69 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | S | 6 | +1 |
650 | 68.75 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| EW |
2 | N | 2 | = |
120 | 62.50 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | N | 8 | = |
620 | 52.56 |
| 3 | 91: B. Tomaszewski - W. Glina, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | N | 6 | = |
400 | 75.00 |
| 4 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
4 | N | 5 | -2 |
-100 | 21.81 |
| 4 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
4 | S | J | = |
620 | 39.75 |
| 4 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
4 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 73.06 |
| 4 | 86: W. Mateńko - E. Kozak, 5.5, ZP |
| NS |
3 | S | 6 | +2 |
660 | 67.08 |
| 4 | 88: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 10.0, ZP |
| NS |
3 | E | K | +1 |
-430 | 8.75 |
| 4 | 88: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 10.0, ZP |
| NS |
4 | N | 6 | = |
130 | 82.50 |
| 4 | 88: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 10.0, ZP |
| NS |
4 | S | Q | -1 |
-100 | 27.50 |
| 4 | 88: A. Kondyjowska - K. Wiliński, 10.0, ZP |
| NS |
3 | E | 1 | -2 |
100 | 60.00 |
| 7 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | W | 6 | -1 |
50 | 18.75 |
| 7 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 x | S | 3 | -2 |
-300 | 46.25 |
| 7 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | S | 8 | +1 |
650 | 11.25 |
| 7 | 85: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 0.0, |
| EW |
4 | E | W | -2 |
100 | 17.50 |
| 7 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | W | 6 | -1 |
100 | 28.65 |
| 7 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
2 | N | A | = |
90 | 67.08 |
| 7 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
4 | W | A | -2 |
100 | 13.82 |
| 7 | 92: W. Jackowski - L. Sulżycki, 11.0, ZP |
| EW |
6 | S | 9 | +1 |
1470 | 3.02 |
