1 | 94: P. Nowicki - K. Falkowski, 10.0, LD/MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 9 | = |
420 | 48.86 |
1 | 94: P. Nowicki - K. Falkowski, 10.0, LD/MA |
| EW |
2 | E | 5 | +1 |
-140 | 31.30 |
1 | 94: P. Nowicki - K. Falkowski, 10.0, LD/MA |
| EW |
4 | S | 6 | +2 |
680 | 76.71 |
2 | 93: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | A | -2 |
-200 | 30.92 |
2 | 93: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | K | +3 |
510 | 77.27 |
2 | 93: D. Krupnik - L. Łuniewski, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 6 | = |
140 | 56.54 |
3 | 86: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | E | 5 | +2 |
-170 | 80.30 |
3 | 86: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | S | 2 | = |
90 | 41.67 |
3 | 86: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 5 | = |
110 | 37.50 |
4 | 96: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 9.0, MA/LD |
| NS |
2 | N | 8 | +1 |
140 | 67.04 |
4 | 96: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 9.0, MA/LD |
| NS |
2 | N | A | +1 |
140 | 76.51 |
4 | 96: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 9.0, MA/LD |
| NS |
4 | W | A | -4 |
200 | 18.56 |
5 | 90: B. Krzewski - A. Amrozy, 12.0, LD |
| EW |
2 | N | A | +2 |
170 | 36.74 |
5 | 90: B. Krzewski - A. Amrozy, 12.0, LD |
| EW |
4 | N | K | +1 |
450 | 45.83 |
5 | 90: B. Krzewski - A. Amrozy, 12.0, LD |
| EW |
3 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 12.98 |
6 | 92: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | E | 10 | = |
-120 | 79.39 |
6 | 92: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 87.50 |
6 | 92: R. Maszenda - M. Maszenda, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 83.33 |
7 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
6 x | S | J | -3 |
-800 | 100.00 |
7 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 x | W | A | -1 |
100 | 67.04 |
7 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - J. Maruszewski, 8.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | Q | +3 |
-690 | 54.20 |
8 | 87: K. Wośkowiak - J. Szczygieł, 9.0, MA |
| NS |
3 x | E | K | -3 |
500 | 45.83 |
8 | 87: K. Wośkowiak - J. Szczygieł, 9.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | J | +3 |
-230 | 80.53 |
8 | 87: K. Wośkowiak - J. Szczygieł, 9.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | 6 | -2 |
200 | 76.33 |
9 | 89: W. Skupiński - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | 3 | -1 |
100 | 85.34 |
9 | 89: W. Skupiński - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 56.39 |
9 | 89: W. Skupiński - J. Dankowski, 3.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 3 | -1 |
-50 | 23.25 |