1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | Q | -1 |
50 | 46.10 |
1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 10 | -1 |
50 | 60.28 |
1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | 3 | -1 |
-50 | 44.68 |
1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | 5 | -3 |
300 | 87.59 |
1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 2 | +1 |
-170 | 15.60 |
1 | 91: L. Łuniewski - R. Maszenda, 15.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | 8 | +3 |
-690 | 20.72 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 8 | +1 |
-650 | 0.00 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 3 | +3 |
200 | 20.72 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 56.74 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | N | 3 | -1 |
-200 | 39.72 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 3 | +2 |
460 | 77.33 |
2 | 92: J. Wiśniewska - S. Wiśniewski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | W | 4 | = |
-510 | 1.45 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | A | +1 |
140 | 53.21 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | K | = |
-110 | 52.50 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 10 | +2 |
-460 | 21.07 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
5 | S | 6 | = |
450 | 56.03 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 7 | +2 |
130 | 10.92 |
3 | 93: L. Pęcherzewski - J. Pęcherzewska, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | 10 | +1 |
-140 | 36.53 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 5 | +2 |
460 | 71.48 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 62.68 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | K | = |
-130 | 34.15 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
4 x | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 22.63 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | A | -2 |
200 | 75.54 |
4 | 94: D. Krajewski - J. Szczygieł, 17.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | 6 | = |
-90 | 51.82 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | J | = |
-120 | 13.61 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
3 x | E | J | -1 |
200 | 75.73 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | W | A | = |
-110 | 0.11 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | 5 | +1 |
120 | 77.41 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
1 | S | J | = |
90 | 37.41 |
5 | 95: R. Kiełkiewicz - T. Gawroński, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 4 | = |
-420 | 41.91 |