| 1 | 125: T. Biernat - R. Sukiennik, 24.0, MP |
| NS |
6  | S | A | +1 |
1460 | 92.39 |
| 1 | 125: T. Biernat - R. Sukiennik, 24.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | S | 5 | +1 |
430 | 21.20 |
| 1 | 125: T. Biernat - R. Sukiennik, 24.0, MP |
| NS |
5  | N | 5 | = |
600 | 84.24 |
| 2 | 124: H. Święch - M. Trybała, 12.0, MP/FRA |
| NS |
4  | S | K | +2 |
680 | 50.00 |
| 2 | 124: H. Święch - M. Trybała, 12.0, MP/FRA |
| NS |
2  | S | K | +1 |
140 | 67.93 |
| 2 | 124: H. Święch - M. Trybała, 12.0, MP/FRA |
| NS |
6  | N | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 8.15 |
| 3 | 123: M. Haldenby - C. Haldenby, 10.0, GBR |
| NS |
1  | W | 6 | +1 |
-120 | 48.91 |
| 3 | 123: M. Haldenby - C. Haldenby, 10.0, GBR |
| NS |
3 x | E | 3 | -1 |
100 | 92.39 |
| 3 | 123: M. Haldenby - C. Haldenby, 10.0, GBR |
| NS |
4  | E | J | -1 |
50 | 92.30 |
| 4 | 122: W. Rybka - K. Gałka, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
TD | | | |
| 50.00 |
| 4 | 122: W. Rybka - K. Gałka, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
4  | E | 6 | = |
-620 | 19.23 |
| 4 | 122: W. Rybka - K. Gałka, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
4  | W | 5 | +2 |
-480 | 26.63 |
| 5 | 130: A. Lubojemski - E. Warząchowski, 25.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | W | K | = |
-600 | 68.48 |
| 5 | 130: A. Lubojemski - E. Warząchowski, 25.0, MP |
| NS |
3 x | N | K | = |
730 | 96.74 |
| 5 | 130: A. Lubojemski - E. Warząchowski, 25.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | W | 3 | -2 |
100 | 25.83 |
| 6 | 128: S. Urbanowski - J. Barczyk, 14.0, MP |
| NS |
4  | E | Q | -1 |
100 | 88.04 |
| 6 | 128: S. Urbanowski - J. Barczyk, 14.0, MP |
| NS |
5  | W | 8 | = |
-650 | 30.43 |
| 6 | 128: S. Urbanowski - J. Barczyk, 14.0, MP |
| NS |
4  | W | 7 | -1 |
50 | 78.16 |
| 7 | 129: R. Cieślik - Z. Burda, 3.0, MP |
| EW |
3  | N | 8 | +2 |
150 | 64.67 |
| 7 | 129: R. Cieślik - Z. Burda, 3.0, MP |
| EW |
3  | W | 7 | +1 |
-430 | 79.89 |
| 7 | 129: R. Cieślik - Z. Burda, 3.0, MP |
| EW |
2  | N | 5 | -1 |
-50 | 67.77 |
| 8 | 127: M. Praszałowicz - M. Wilczyński, 9.0, MP |
| EW |
4  | S | J | = |
620 | 75.27 |
| 8 | 127: M. Praszałowicz - M. Wilczyński, 9.0, MP |
| EW |
3  | E | K | = |
-140 | 72.83 |
| 8 | 127: M. Praszałowicz - M. Wilczyński, 9.0, MP |
| EW |
2  | N | K | -2 |
-100 | 80.77 |
| 9 | 126: E. Skąpska - K. Skąpski, 4.5, MP |
| EW |
3  | S | 3 | = |
140 | 51.09 |
| 9 | 126: E. Skąpska - K. Skąpski, 4.5, MP |
| EW |
3  | W | T | +2 |
-460 | 100.00 |
| 9 | 126: E. Skąpska - K. Skąpski, 4.5, MP |
| EW |
4  | W | T | = |
-620 | 29.35 |