1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
5 | N | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 93.62 |
1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | +1 |
650 | 49.29 |
1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
3 | E | 10 | +1 |
-170 | 36.65 |
1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
3 | S | K | +1 |
170 | 27.27 |
1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
2 | S | 3 | -1 |
-100 | 55.84 |
1 | 249: B. Ertel - J. Adamczak, 5.0, LB |
| EW |
4 | S | 5 | = |
420 | 20.96 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
5 | W | A | +1 |
-620 | 50.42 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
4 | W | 8 | +2 |
-480 | 2.84 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
3 | E | 10 | -1 |
100 | 56.64 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
1 | E | 6 | -2 |
200 | 91.07 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
4 | E | K | +1 |
-450 | 14.73 |
2 | 254: T. Rudziński - A. Cukier, 8.0, LB |
| NS |
3 | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 50.42 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
6 | N | A | = |
1370 | 83.52 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
4 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 28.33 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
1 | W | A | = |
-90 | 49.43 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
3 | E | J | = |
-600 | 70.84 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
3 | E | K | +2 |
-460 | 57.49 |
3 | 251: J. Kaczmarek - A. Spychała, 8.0, WP |
| NS |
3 | N | 7 | +1 |
630 | 65.77 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
3 | S | K | +1 |
130 | 66.33 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
3 | W | 5 | +4 |
-720 | 42.31 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
4 | S | J | +1 |
650 | 42.94 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
3 | S | A | -2 |
-100 | 41.01 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
4 | S | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 87.92 |
4 | 252: E. Kulus - D. Kwiatkowski, 13.0, LB/WP |
| EW |
3 x | E | Q | -2 |
300 | 36.43 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
5 x | S | K | -1 |
-100 | 18.52 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
4 | S | J | -1 |
-100 | 89.25 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
2 | W | 4 | +1 |
-150 | 65.50 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
4 | W | 3 | = |
-420 | 83.81 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
4 | S | Q | -2 |
-200 | 95.08 |
5 | 253: T. Jarmoliński - W. Pastuszko, 12.0, LB |
| EW |
3 | W | J | +1 |
-430 | 45.37 |