1 | 8: D. Wacławek - J. Tomaszczuk, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 3 | = |
-620 | 3.85 |
1 | 8: D. Wacławek - J. Tomaszczuk, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
6 | N | A | = |
1370 | 44.23 |
1 | 8: D. Wacławek - J. Tomaszczuk, 3.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | E | 9 | = |
-620 | 36.54 |
2 | 9: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | Q | +1 |
-170 | 38.46 |
2 | 9: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | K | = |
120 | 19.23 |
2 | 9: E. Wróblewska - S. Stachlewski, 13.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | 9 | +2 |
680 | 44.23 |
3 | 10: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | S | 9 | = |
80 | 0.00 |
3 | 10: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 2 | = |
-420 | 17.31 |
3 | 10: R. Siedlecki - R. Sadowski, 10.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | S | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 28.85 |
4 | 5: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | 3 | +2 |
480 | 38.46 |
4 | 5: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 2 | -1 |
100 | 78.85 |
4 | 5: I. Ziółkowska - A. Ziółkowski, 0.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | K | = |
110 | 92.31 |
5 | 6: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
1 x | E | J | -2 |
500 | 11.54 |
5 | 6: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | J | +3 |
170 | 30.77 |
5 | 6: C. Czyżkowski - J. Koter, 17.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 17.31 |
6 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - A. Łaszczotko, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | S | 6 | +2 |
480 | 48.08 |
6 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - A. Łaszczotko, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 23.08 |
6 | 12: P. Józefaciuk - A. Łaszczotko, 7.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | W | J | +1 |
-630 | 42.31 |
7 | 11: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | A | -2 |
-100 | 86.54 |
7 | 11: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | N | A | = |
620 | 50.00 |
7 | 11: T. Mikołajczyk - T. Pawlak, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 x | W | K | -2 |
300 | 22.04 |
8 | 14: A. Rybak - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | W | A | = |
-600 | 90.38 |
8 | 14: A. Rybak - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 6 | +3 |
-510 | 19.23 |
8 | 14: A. Rybak - R. Michalski, 5.0, MA |
| EW |
4 x | W | A | -2 |
500 | 5.77 |
9 | 13: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
5 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 17.31 |
9 | 13: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 9 | +2 |
170 | 65.38 |
9 | 13: M. Wrocławski - W. Rutkowski, 6.0, MA |
| NS |
4 | N | 8 | = |
420 | 92.31 |