| 1 | 4: L. Borzęcki - K. Kusowski, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
4  x | W |  K | -1 |
100 | 83.96 |
| 1 | 4: L. Borzęcki - K. Kusowski, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
3  | S | 3 | -3 |
-150 | 13.21 |
| 1 | 4: L. Borzęcki - K. Kusowski, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
4 x | W |  2 | -2 |
500 | 85.85 |
| 1 | 4: L. Borzęcki - K. Kusowski, 1.0, KP |
| NS |
5 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 31.13 |
| 2 | 6: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | Q | = |
400 | 7.55 |
| 2 | 6: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP |
| EW |
3 | E | 5 | -3 |
300 | 9.43 |
| 2 | 6: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP |
| EW |
1 | S |  K | = |
90 | 50.94 |
| 2 | 6: E. Malka - M. Ciesielski, 0.5, KP |
| EW |
2 | N | K | +1 |
140 | 33.02 |
| 3 | 1: G. Rempel - W. Płaczkiewicz, 3.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 72.64 |
| 3 | 1: G. Rempel - W. Płaczkiewicz, 3.5, KP |
| NS |
2 | S | 2 | +1 |
140 | 98.11 |
| 3 | 1: G. Rempel - W. Płaczkiewicz, 3.5, KP |
| NS |
2 | N | Q | -2 |
-100 | 16.48 |
| 3 | 1: G. Rempel - W. Płaczkiewicz, 3.5, KP |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | +2 |
-460 | 6.33 |
| 4 | 3: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 2.5, KP |
| NS |
4 x | S | K | -2 |
-500 | 2.83 |
| 4 | 3: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 2.5, KP |
| NS |
3 x | E | 6 | -3 |
800 | 96.23 |
| 4 | 3: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 2.5, KP |
| NS |
4 | W | K | -1 |
100 | 78.30 |
| 4 | 3: M. Operlejn - J. Piwoński, 2.5, KP |
| NS |
2 | S | 3 | +1 |
150 | 97.17 |
| 5 | 8: J. Graniczny - P. Kacprzak, 4.5, KP |
| EW |
2 | E | 8 | -4 |
200 | 1.89 |
| 5 | 8: J. Graniczny - P. Kacprzak, 4.5, KP |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | = |
-400 | 72.64 |
| 5 | 8: J. Graniczny - P. Kacprzak, 4.5, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | 9 | +3 |
490 | 67.92 |
| 5 | 8: J. Graniczny - P. Kacprzak, 4.5, KP |
| EW |
3 | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 34.91 |
| 6 | 7: A. Sekuła - P. Łęcki, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | S | W | = |
120 | 53.77 |
| 6 | 7: A. Sekuła - P. Łęcki, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
2 x | N | Q | -2 |
-500 | 90.57 |
| 6 | 7: A. Sekuła - P. Łęcki, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
3 | S | X | = |
140 | 15.09 |
| 6 | 7: A. Sekuła - P. Łęcki, 10.0, KP |
| EW |
4 | S | 9 | = |
620 | 1.89 |
| 7 | 2: E. Zalewska - M. Kazimierczak, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | W | 4 | -1 |
100 | 55.66 |
| 7 | 2: E. Zalewska - M. Kazimierczak, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
4 | E | A | = |
-420 | 64.15 |
| 7 | 2: E. Zalewska - M. Kazimierczak, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
2 | N | K | = |
110 | 22.64 |
| 7 | 2: E. Zalewska - M. Kazimierczak, 4.0, KP |
| EW |
1 | W | 5 | -1 |
100 | 15.09 |
