| 1 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3  | N | | +2 |
460 | 89.71 |
| 1 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
2  | E | | = |
-90 | 52.11 |
| 1 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4  | N | | +2 |
480 | 58.38 |
| 1 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
3  | N | | +3 |
490 | 74.86 |
| 1 | 597: D. Łukaszewicz - B. Diakite, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
2  | W | | = |
-110 | 32.96 |
| 1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
4 x | N | | -1 |
-200 | 0.56 |
| 1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
1  | W | | -1 |
50 | 77.56 |
| 1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
2  | W | | +3 |
-150 | 48.73 |
| 1 | 599: B. Jurecki - R. Stankiewicz, 0.0, NZ |
| NS |
6  | W | | = |
-1440 | 26.90 |
| 2 | 594: M. Słowikowski - M. Lemecha, 3.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
3  | W | | -1 |
50 | 57.91 |
| 2 | 594: M. Słowikowski - M. Lemecha, 3.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
2  | E | | +2 |
-170 | 60.86 |
| 2 | 594: M. Słowikowski - M. Lemecha, 3.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
5  | E | | +2 |
-710 | 33.57 |
| 2 | 594: M. Słowikowski - M. Lemecha, 3.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
4  | E | | -2 |
100 | 78.83 |
| 2 | 594: M. Słowikowski - M. Lemecha, 3.0, WM/NZ |
| NS |
2  | E | | -1 |
100 | 80.73 |
| 2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
3  | N | | = |
110 | 55.10 |
| 2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
4  | N | | +1 |
650 | 83.98 |
| 2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
1  | N | | +1 |
110 | 31.03 |
| 2 | 598: W. Pietrzak - A. Czumaj, 7.0, WM |
| EW |
3  | S | | +2 |
460 | 25.70 |
| 3 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
4  | N | | = |
420 | 36.72 |
| 3 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
2  | N | | +2 |
170 | 48.73 |
| 3 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
2  | N | | +3 |
200 | 28.87 |
| 3 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3  | N | | +3 |
170 | 75.21 |
| 3 | 600: J. Jegliński - T. Kądzielewski, 14.0, WM |
| EW |
3  | W | | = |
-140 | 68.18 |
| 4 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| EW |
5 x | E | | -2 |
300 | 4.52 |
| 4 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| EW |
2  | W | | -3 |
150 | 5.35 |
| 4 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| EW |
4  | N | | -2 |
-100 | 84.51 |
| 4 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| EW |
4  | W | | = |
-620 | 34.04 |
| 4 | 595: M. Grodzki - H. Łakomski, 16.0, WM |
| EW |
5 x | W | | -2 |
300 | 45.62 |
| 4 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2  | W | | -1 |
50 | 10.17 |
| 4 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | E | | -2 |
100 | 44.49 |
| 4 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
1  | E | | +2 |
-150 | 59.66 |
| 4 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3  | N | | = |
400 | 19.19 |
| 4 | 593: P. Czacharowski - J. Wiszniewski, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4  | N | | +2 |
680 | 79.66 |