| 1 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
5  x | W |  2 | -2 |
300 | 100.00 |
| 1 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | E | J | -2 |
100 | 67.89 |
| 1 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
4 x | N |  K | -1 |
-100 | 33.33 |
| 2 | 100: A. Hycnar - S. Reising, 14.5, PK/MP |
| NS |
4 | W | J | -2 |
200 | 92.27 |
| 2 | 100: A. Hycnar - S. Reising, 14.5, PK/MP |
| NS |
4 | E | 9 | +1 |
-450 | 70.32 |
| 2 | 100: A. Hycnar - S. Reising, 14.5, PK/MP |
| NS |
4 | W | 2 | +1 |
-650 | 8.20 |
| 3 | 89: K. Kapusta - A. Gałęza, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
3  | W | 6 | +2 |
-660 | 30.90 |
| 3 | 89: K. Kapusta - A. Gałęza, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
6 | E | 7 | = |
-980 | 32.11 |
| 3 | 89: K. Kapusta - A. Gałęza, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
1 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 43.09 |
| 4 | 99: W. Guła - W. Sypień, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | N | Q | +2 |
170 | 67.07 |
| 4 | 99: W. Guła - W. Sypień, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | E | 9 | = |
-90 | 71.54 |
| 4 | 99: W. Guła - W. Sypień, 9.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | W | J | -2 |
100 | 13.82 |
| 5 | 98: A. Dmochowski - T. Murczek, 16.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | W | 5 | = |
-90 | 35.89 |
| 5 | 98: A. Dmochowski - T. Murczek, 16.0, MP |
| NS |
4 | N | Q | +1 |
450 | 59.27 |
| 5 | 98: A. Dmochowski - T. Murczek, 16.0, MP |
| NS |
3 x | E | A | -2 |
300 | 96.37 |
| 6 | 102: W. Stachnik - R. Wajdowicz, 19.0, MP/PK |
| NS |
4 x | N | K | -4 |
-800 | 6.97 |
| 6 | 102: W. Stachnik - R. Wajdowicz, 19.0, MP/PK |
| NS |
2 | E | 4 | -1 |
50 | 68.70 |
| 6 | 102: W. Stachnik - R. Wajdowicz, 19.0, MP/PK |
| NS |
4 | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 2.47 |
| 7 | 86: M. Rodzaj - A. Stono, 18.0, MP/PK |
| EW |
5 x | E | A | -1 |
200 | 5.74 |
| 7 | 86: M. Rodzaj - A. Stono, 18.0, MP/PK |
| EW |
3 | E | 6 | = |
-600 | 81.96 |
| 7 | 86: M. Rodzaj - A. Stono, 18.0, MP/PK |
| EW |
2 | E | K | +1 |
-140 | 82.23 |
| 8 | 87: R. Mostek - Z. Szkołut, 8.0, MP |
| EW |
4 | S | K | -1 |
-50 | 85.70 |
| 8 | 87: R. Mostek - Z. Szkołut, 8.0, MP |
| EW |
2 | E | K | +2 |
-170 | 70.58 |
| 8 | 87: R. Mostek - Z. Szkołut, 8.0, MP |
| EW |
2 | N | 2 | = |
110 | 24.16 |
| 9 | 97: K. Banek - J. Danek, 12.0, MP |
| EW |
3 | W | 7 | = |
-140 | 95.78 |
| 9 | 97: K. Banek - J. Danek, 12.0, MP |
| EW |
3 | E | 2 | +1 |
-630 | 81.08 |
| 9 | 97: K. Banek - J. Danek, 12.0, MP |
| EW |
3 | W | 5 | -1 |
50 | 35.68 |
| 10 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
2 | S | A | +2 |
170 | 41.48 |
| 10 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
6 | W | 2 | = |
-1430 | 15.46 |
| 10 | 92: M. Surmiak - P. Markiewicz, 10.0, MP |
| NS |
3 | W | 2 | +2 |
-460 | 46.27 |
