| 1 | 144: M. Ciszewski - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
7 | NS |
2  | N |  6 | +2 |
180 | 0.81 |
| 1 | 144: M. Ciszewski - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
8 | NS |
2 | S | 5 | -3 |
-150 | -3.95 |
| 1 | 144: M. Ciszewski - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
9 | NS |
5  | W |  7 | = |
-600 | -0.88 |
| 2 | 141: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
10 | NS |
3 | E | J | +1 |
-630 | -2.31 |
| 2 | 141: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
11 | NS |
1 | S |  5 | = |
90 | 2.17 |
| 2 | 141: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
12 | NS |
2 | W | 5 | = |
-110 | -1.66 |
| 3 | 139: A. Żelazny - J. Bejma, 10.0, MA |
13 | NS |
3 | S | J | +1 |
630 | 4.69 |
| 3 | 139: A. Żelazny - J. Bejma, 10.0, MA |
14 | NS |
3 | N | 9 | +3 |
490 | -3.94 |
| 3 | 139: A. Żelazny - J. Bejma, 10.0, MA |
15 | NS |
3 | E | Q | +1 |
-430 | -0.88 |
| 4 | 148: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
16 | NS |
1 | S | K | +1 |
120 | -0.97 |
| 4 | 148: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
17 | NS |
3 | W | 6 | +2 |
-460 | -2.82 |
| 4 | 148: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
18 | NS |
4 x | N | Q | = |
790 | 9.94 |
| 5 | 142: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
19 | NS |
2 | S | J | +2 |
170 | -4.47 |
| 5 | 142: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
20 | NS |
3 | E | 7 | = |
-600 | -1.14 |
| 5 | 142: M. Bykowska - A. Leśniewski, 2.0, MA |
21 | NS |
1 | E | 4 | +1 |
-120 | -1.48 |
| 6 | 147: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
22 | NS |
3 | E | J | +2 |
-660 | -5.22 |
| 6 | 147: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
23 | NS |
3 | S | A | -3 |
-300 | 6.50 |
| 6 | 147: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
24 | NS |
2 | W | 2 | = |
-110 | 2.94 |
| 7 | 140: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
25 | NS |
1 | N | 8 | -1 |
-50 | -1.06 |
| 7 | 140: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
26 | NS |
3 | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | -9.09 |
| 7 | 140: H. Kędziorek - S. Rokicki, 6.5, MA |
27 | NS |
4 | W | 9 | = |
-420 | 0.14 |
| 8 | 145: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4 | W | 9 | -1 |
50 | 5.84 |
| 8 | 145: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
2 | NS |
4 | E | 8 | = |
-420 | -3.25 |
| 8 | 145: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
3 | NS |
6 | W | 7 | -1 |
100 | 7.55 |
| 9 | 146: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
4 | NS |
3 | E | 4 | +1 |
-630 | -2.60 |
| 9 | 146: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
5 | NS |
4 | E | 10 | = |
-420 | -2.74 |
| 9 | 146: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
6 | NS |
3 | E | Q | +1 |
-170 | 5.74 |
