| 1 | 606: M. Sankiewicz - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
3  | S |  3 | +1 |
170 | 34.58 |
| 1 | 606: M. Sankiewicz - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
4 | W | J | +2 |
-680 | 47.98 |
| 1 | 606: M. Sankiewicz - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
3  | S |  2 | +2 |
660 | 77.86 |
| 2 | 607: J. Sadowski - B. Drozd, 17.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
3 | N | J | +2 |
460 | 8.51 |
| 2 | 607: J. Sadowski - B. Drozd, 17.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
2 | N | J | +1 |
140 | 23.45 |
| 2 | 607: J. Sadowski - B. Drozd, 17.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
4 | S | 3 | +1 |
450 | 13.86 |
| 3 | 608: M. Tuziemski - W. Gonera, 4.0, ZP/- |
25 | EW |
6 | N | 9 | = |
980 | 38.98 |
| 3 | 608: M. Tuziemski - W. Gonera, 4.0, ZP/- |
26 | EW |
4 | E |  A | = |
-620 | 67.69 |
| 3 | 608: M. Tuziemski - W. Gonera, 4.0, ZP/- |
27 | EW |
3 | N | Q | +2 |
200 | 21.42 |
| 4 | 609: C. Wojtaś - H. Tyburczy, 12.0, ZP |
28 | EW |
3 | S | 2 | +1 |
170 | 56.04 |
| 4 | 609: C. Wojtaś - H. Tyburczy, 12.0, ZP |
29 | EW |
3 | S | 7 | +1 |
130 | 45.59 |
| 4 | 609: C. Wojtaś - H. Tyburczy, 12.0, ZP |
30 | EW |
3 | W | J | = |
-140 | 72.07 |
| 5 | 610: W. Mestl - W. Glina, 0.0, |
1 | EW |
2 | W | 9 | +2 |
-170 | 54.98 |
| 5 | 610: W. Mestl - W. Glina, 0.0, |
2 | EW |
2 | E | 10 | +3 |
-200 | 64.95 |
| 5 | 610: W. Mestl - W. Glina, 0.0, |
3 | EW |
4 | W | 5 | -1 |
100 | 19.91 |
| 6 | 611: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 5.5, ZP |
4 | EW |
2 | S | K | +2 |
170 | 30.00 |
| 6 | 611: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 5.5, ZP |
5 | EW |
2 | W | 9 | = |
-110 | 84.01 |
| 6 | 611: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 5.5, ZP |
6 | EW |
4 | W | 5 | -1 |
100 | 13.80 |
| 7 | 612: W. Korbutowicz - J. Adamczyk, 9.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
4 | E | 2 | -2 |
200 | 29.19 |
| 7 | 612: W. Korbutowicz - J. Adamczyk, 9.0, ZP |
8 | EW |
3 | E | A | = |
-140 | 48.45 |
| 7 | 612: W. Korbutowicz - J. Adamczyk, 9.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
3 | W | 5 | = |
-600 | 36.07 |
| 8 | 603: E. Kowalczyk - H. Dacewicz, 0.0, |
10 | EW |
4 | E | A | +1 |
-150 | 60.99 |
| 8 | 603: E. Kowalczyk - H. Dacewicz, 0.0, |
11 | EW |
2 | W | 8 | -1 |
50 | 26.63 |
| 8 | 603: E. Kowalczyk - H. Dacewicz, 0.0, |
12 | EW |
4 | S | 7 | = |
620 | 87.27 |
| 9 | 604: K. Wiliński - H. Pakuła, 12.0, ZP |
13 | EW |
3 | W | 5 | +2 |
-660 | 68.42 |
| 9 | 604: K. Wiliński - H. Pakuła, 12.0, ZP |
14 | EW |
3 | E | 4 | = |
-140 | 95.36 |
| 9 | 604: K. Wiliński - H. Pakuła, 12.0, ZP |
15 | EW |
3 | S | 7 | +2 |
660 | 4.99 |
| 10 | 605: R. Domińczak - W. Mateńko, 8.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
4 | S | 5 | +1 |
450 | 50.00 |
| 10 | 605: R. Domińczak - W. Mateńko, 8.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
3 | N | A | = |
140 | 31.31 |
| 10 | 605: R. Domińczak - W. Mateńko, 8.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
3 | S | A | = |
600 | 2.63 |
