| 1 | 84: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
1 | NS |
3  | N |  4 | -1 |
-50 | -0.58 |
| 1 | 84: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
2 | NS |
1 | W |  5 | +1 |
-120 | 3.18 |
| 1 | 84: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
3 | NS |
1 | S |  J | -1 |
-50 | -0.34 |
| 2 | 93: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
19 | EW |
6 | N | K | -3 |
-150 | 9.29 |
| 2 | 93: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
20 | EW |
3 | W |  2 | -1 |
100 | -11.04 |
| 2 | 93: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
21 | EW |
3 | W | A | = |
-140 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 94: S. Cieśla - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
10 | NS |
2 | E | Q | -2 |
200 | 2.45 |
| 3 | 94: S. Cieśla - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
11 | NS |
4 | W | K | -1 |
50 | 0.21 |
| 3 | 94: S. Cieśla - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
12 | NS |
4 x | W | 2 | -2 |
300 | 6.99 |
| 4 | 87: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
13 | EW |
2 | E | J | = |
-110 | 2.40 |
| 4 | 87: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
14 | EW |
3 | W | 6 | -1 |
50 | -3.15 |
| 4 | 87: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
15 | EW |
4 | E | Q | -1 |
50 | -2.42 |
| 5 | 90: G. Sitek - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
22 | NS |
5 | E | 2 | -3 |
300 | 9.39 |
| 5 | 90: G. Sitek - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
23 | NS |
PASS | | | = |
0 | -2.32 |
| 5 | 90: G. Sitek - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
24 | NS |
3 x | E | 10 | = |
-470 | -10.92 |
| 6 | 89: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
16 | EW |
3 | N | 10 | +2 |
460 | -3.54 |
| 6 | 89: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
17 | EW |
6 | W | 6 | = |
-980 | 10.58 |
| 6 | 89: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
18 | EW |
4 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 0.35 |
| 7 | 85: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
25 | EW |
3 | N | 10 | +2 |
460 | -5.37 |
| 7 | 85: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
26 | EW |
2 | S | 8 | = |
110 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 85: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
27 | EW |
3 | E | 3 | = |
-400 | 5.45 |
| 8 | 91: Z. Zaręba - J. Cała, 5.5, MA |
7 | EW |
3 | W | 7 | -2 |
200 | -3.37 |
| 8 | 91: Z. Zaręba - J. Cała, 5.5, MA |
8 | EW |
5 | N | K | +1 |
420 | 5.55 |
| 8 | 91: Z. Zaręba - J. Cała, 5.5, MA |
9 | EW |
6 | E | K | -1 |
100 | -7.77 |
| 9 | 92: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
4 | NS |
4 x | N | J | -2 |
-500 | -10.69 |
| 9 | 92: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
5 | NS |
3 | E | 6 | = |
-140 | -1.09 |
| 9 | 92: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
6 | NS |
6 | W | 9 | = |
-1440 | -5.18 |
