| 1 | 103: R. Werbanowski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
3  | S | 7 | -3 |
-300 | 4.35 |
| 1 | 103: R. Werbanowski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
6  | E | A | -1 |
50 | -7.32 |
| 1 | 103: R. Werbanowski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
5 x | W | A | -1 |
100 | -3.82 |
| 2 | 101: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
4 | NS |
6  | N | 6 | -1 |
-100 | -11.83 |
| 2 | 101: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
5 | NS |
4 x | E | K | -4 |
800 | 12.46 |
| 2 | 101: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
6 | NS |
4  | W | A | -2 |
200 | 4.02 |
| 3 | 96: E. Kręgielewski - J. Tomaszewski, 0.0, |
10 | NS |
6  | N | 2 | +1 |
1460 | 2.16 |
| 3 | 96: E. Kręgielewski - J. Tomaszewski, 0.0, |
11 | NS |
4  | W | 5 | -2 |
100 | 4.01 |
| 3 | 96: E. Kręgielewski - J. Tomaszewski, 0.0, |
12 | NS |
3  | W | 3 | -1 |
50 | 7.40 |
| 4 | 99: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
16 | EW |
3  | N | 5 | +1 |
430 | -0.06 |
| 4 | 99: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
17 | EW |
3  | E | 2 | -1 |
50 | -2.26 |
| 4 | 99: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
18 | EW |
1  | S | 2 | -2 |
-200 | 1.45 |
| 5 | 95: M. Ciszewski - M. Gawin, 0.0, |
22 | EW |
4  | W | 4 | +1 |
-650 | 1.65 |
| 5 | 95: M. Ciszewski - M. Gawin, 0.0, |
23 | EW |
4  | S | 3 | +1 |
650 | -2.39 |
| 5 | 95: M. Ciszewski - M. Gawin, 0.0, |
24 | EW |
1  | N | 6 | -2 |
-100 | 1.61 |
| 6 | 98: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
25 | NS |
7 x | N | J | -1 |
-100 | -10.99 |
| 6 | 98: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
26 | NS |
4  | W | 4 | +1 |
-650 | -0.37 |
| 6 | 98: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
27 | NS |
4  | S | A | +2 |
480 | 0.28 |
| 7 | 102: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
19 | EW |
4  | E | A | +1 |
-150 | -2.90 |
| 7 | 102: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
20 | EW |
4  | W | 4 | +1 |
-650 | 5.06 |
| 7 | 102: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
21 | EW |
2  | E | A | -1 |
50 | -0.24 |
| 8 | 97: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
7 | NS |
7 x | S | 9 | -2 |
-500 | -15.33 |
| 8 | 97: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
8 | NS |
3  | S | 6 | -2 |
-100 | -3.05 |
| 8 | 97: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
9 | NS |
4  | E | Q | = |
-620 | -9.98 |
| 9 | 100: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 9.0, MA |
1 | EW |
2  | W | 5 | +1 |
-150 | -0.93 |
| 9 | 100: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 9.0, MA |
2 | EW |
3  | E | 3 | +2 |
-460 | 7.01 |
| 9 | 100: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 9.0, MA |
3 | EW |
3  | W | 2 | +1 |
-630 | 1.33 |