| 1 | 540: Ł. Szuper - K. Płończak, 1.5, PM/- |
5 | EW |
3  | N | 4 | +1 |
630 | 64.48 |
| 1 | 540: Ł. Szuper - K. Płończak, 1.5, PM/- |
6 | EW |
3  | S | K | = |
110 | 17.39 |
| 1 | 540: Ł. Szuper - K. Płończak, 1.5, PM/- |
7 | EW |
3  | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 29.21 |
| 1 | 540: Ł. Szuper - K. Płończak, 1.5, PM/- |
8 | EW |
3 x | N | 6 | -5 |
-1100 | 98.77 |
| 2 | 542: M. Szymoniak - K. Markiewicz, 2.0, PM |
21 | NS |
2  | W | K | = |
-90 | 36.75 |
| 2 | 542: M. Szymoniak - K. Markiewicz, 2.0, PM |
22 | NS |
6  | N | 3 | = |
980 | 95.09 |
| 2 | 542: M. Szymoniak - K. Markiewicz, 2.0, PM |
23 | NS |
3 x | E | 7 | -3 |
800 | 99.73 |
| 2 | 542: M. Szymoniak - K. Markiewicz, 2.0, PM |
24 | NS |
4  | S | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 28.59 |
| 3 | 537: M. Banasiński - A. Twardowski, 22.0, WP/DS |
17 | NS |
1  | E | 10 | +1 |
-120 | 16.37 |
| 3 | 537: M. Banasiński - A. Twardowski, 22.0, WP/DS |
18 | NS |
2  | W | Q | -1 |
50 | 58.90 |
| 3 | 537: M. Banasiński - A. Twardowski, 22.0, WP/DS |
19 | NS |
4  | N | K | -2 |
-100 | 32.43 |
| 3 | 537: M. Banasiński - A. Twardowski, 22.0, WP/DS |
20 | NS |
3 x | N | A | -2 |
-500 | 51.09 |
| 4 | 543: M. Parol - M. Tomczewska, 14.0, PM |
13 | EW |
4  | W | 10 | = |
-620 | 93.99 |
| 4 | 543: M. Parol - M. Tomczewska, 14.0, PM |
14 | EW |
2  | S | K | +1 |
140 | 28.22 |
| 4 | 543: M. Parol - M. Tomczewska, 14.0, PM |
15 | EW |
3  | E | 3 | +1 |
-430 | 50.41 |
| 4 | 543: M. Parol - M. Tomczewska, 14.0, PM |
16 | EW |
2  | N | 2 | -1 |
-50 | 41.26 |
| 5 | 541: M. Stasiński - Z. Banach, 7.5, PM |
25 | EW |
4 x | N | 2 | -4 |
-800 | 96.33 |
| 5 | 541: M. Stasiński - Z. Banach, 7.5, PM |
26 | EW |
2  | W | 5 | -2 |
200 | 13.22 |
| 5 | 541: M. Stasiński - Z. Banach, 7.5, PM |
27 | EW |
3  | E | A | -1 |
50 | 33.02 |
| 5 | 541: M. Stasiński - Z. Banach, 7.5, PM |
28 | EW |
3  | N | A | +1 |
170 | 30.37 |
| 6 | 536: M. Pietrzak - W. Maciejewski, 12.0, PM |
9 | EW |
4  | S | 3 | -1 |
-50 | 69.48 |
| 6 | 536: M. Pietrzak - W. Maciejewski, 12.0, PM |
10 | EW |
3  | E | 5 | +1 |
-630 | 66.98 |
| 6 | 536: M. Pietrzak - W. Maciejewski, 12.0, PM |
11 | EW |
5  | N | A | = |
450 | 20.79 |
| 6 | 536: M. Pietrzak - W. Maciejewski, 12.0, PM |
12 | EW |
1  | N | 6 | +1 |
120 | 14.44 |
| 7 | 538: K. Meyer - K. Boniek, 10.0, PM |
1 | NS |
3  | N | J | +2 |
460 | 76.98 |
| 7 | 538: K. Meyer - K. Boniek, 10.0, PM |
2 | NS |
4 x | E | K | = |
-590 | 2.18 |
| 7 | 538: K. Meyer - K. Boniek, 10.0, PM |
3 | NS |
3  | S | A | = |
110 | 75.95 |
| 7 | 538: K. Meyer - K. Boniek, 10.0, PM |
4 | NS |
3  | W | 5 | +2 |
-660 | 20.65 |