| 1 | 156: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
13 | NS |
3  | E |  2 | = |
-600 | -7.96 |
| 1 | 156: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
14 | NS |
5  | E |  2 | -1 |
50 | 6.29 |
| 1 | 156: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
15 | NS |
3 | S | 9 | -2 |
-200 | -2.36 |
| 2 | 147: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
7 | EW |
3 | E | A | -1 |
100 | -2.26 |
| 2 | 147: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
8 | EW |
3 | W | Q | = |
-110 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 147: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
9 | EW |
3 | N |  A | -2 |
-100 | -6.62 |
| 3 | 153: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
19 | EW |
3 | W | 6 | = |
-110 | 0.86 |
| 3 | 153: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
20 | EW |
2 | S | K | +1 |
110 | -2.77 |
| 3 | 153: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
21 | EW |
4 | S | A | = |
620 | -4.29 |
| 4 | 152: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
10 | NS |
2 | W | J | +1 |
-140 | -2.51 |
| 4 | 152: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
11 | NS |
4 x | E | A | -1 |
100 | 4.92 |
| 4 | 152: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
12 | NS |
1 | S | 3 | +1 |
120 | -3.54 |
| 5 | 154: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
16 | NS |
3 | S | J | +3 |
490 | -1.40 |
| 5 | 154: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
17 | NS |
4 | S | 5 | = |
130 | -3.81 |
| 5 | 154: W. Gawin - M. Ciszewski, 0.0, |
18 | NS |
2 | W | A | -3 |
150 | -0.41 |
| 6 | 151: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
22 | EW |
2 | W | A | -2 |
200 | -5.61 |
| 6 | 151: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
23 | EW |
3 | E | 6 | +2 |
-150 | -3.23 |
| 6 | 151: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
24 | EW |
3 | E | 5 | -1 |
50 | -6.47 |
| 7 | 150: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
1 | EW |
4 | E | J | +1 |
-450 | 2.57 |
| 7 | 150: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
2 | EW |
5 | W | K | = |
-400 | 5.10 |
| 7 | 150: S. Grzenda - D. Krogul, 0.0, |
3 | EW |
3 | S | Q | = |
400 | -3.70 |
| 8 | 148: J. Tomaszewski - E. Kręgielewski, 0.0, |
4 | NS |
2 | N | 5 | -3 |
-300 | -6.65 |
| 8 | 148: J. Tomaszewski - E. Kręgielewski, 0.0, |
5 | NS |
4 | N | 2 | +1 |
650 | 1.05 |
| 8 | 148: J. Tomaszewski - E. Kręgielewski, 0.0, |
6 | NS |
2 | W | J | = |
-110 | -5.07 |
| 9 | 149: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
25 | EW |
3 | W | 6 | -1 |
100 | -7.94 |
| 9 | 149: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
26 | EW |
1 | W | J | -1 |
100 | -2.49 |
| 9 | 149: M. Gawin - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
27 | EW |
2 | N | K | +2 |
130 | -0.08 |
