| 1 | 125: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
4 | EW |
4  | S | A | +1 |
650 | -0.56 |
| 1 | 125: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
5 | EW |
4  | N | 3 | +2 |
680 | -0.17 |
| 1 | 125: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
6 | EW |
4  | E | A | = |
-620 | 6.02 |
| 3 | 132: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
7 | EW |
4  | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 4.60 |
| 3 | 132: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
8 | EW |
3  | E | Q | +1 |
-430 | -0.53 |
| 3 | 132: A. Żelazny - W. Cała, 10.0, MA |
9 | EW |
3  | W | 4 | -1 |
100 | -7.14 |
| 4 | 124: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
16 | EW |
3  | E | 2 | = |
-140 | 2.43 |
| 4 | 124: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
17 | EW |
3  | N | Q | -1 |
-50 | -0.56 |
| 4 | 124: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
18 | EW |
3  | N | 2 | = |
600 | 0.34 |
| 5 | 131: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
25 | EW |
3  | S | 5 | -3 |
-150 | 5.51 |
| 5 | 131: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
26 | EW |
6 x | E | 3 | -1 |
200 | -4.75 |
| 5 | 131: S. Rokicki - H. Kędziorek, 6.5, MA |
27 | EW |
2  | W | J | = |
-110 | 1.03 |
| 6 | 134: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
22 | NS |
3  | E | 4 | = |
-600 | -8.12 |
| 6 | 134: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
23 | NS |
6  | E | 9 | = |
-1430 | -12.41 |
| 6 | 134: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
24 | NS |
4  | W | 6 | -1 |
50 | 2.38 |
| 7 | 127: J. Korwin-Mikke - Z. Skibicki, 7.0, -/MA |
19 | NS |
3  | W | 10 | -1 |
100 | 1.84 |
| 7 | 127: J. Korwin-Mikke - Z. Skibicki, 7.0, -/MA |
20 | NS |
5  | N | K | -2 |
-200 | -9.38 |
| 7 | 127: J. Korwin-Mikke - Z. Skibicki, 7.0, -/MA |
21 | NS |
2  | E | 9 | = |
-120 | -0.31 |
| 8 | 133: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
10 | EW |
2  | S | A | +1 |
140 | -3.09 |
| 8 | 133: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
11 | EW |
4  | S | A | +1 |
450 | -0.15 |
| 8 | 133: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
12 | EW |
3  | E | 4 | +1 |
-130 | -1.18 |
| 9 | 129: P. Siekański - J. Bejma, 9.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4  | W | A | = |
-420 | -1.28 |
| 9 | 129: P. Siekański - J. Bejma, 9.0, MA |
2 | NS |
5  | S | 9 | = |
650 | 3.53 |
| 9 | 129: P. Siekański - J. Bejma, 9.0, MA |
3 | NS |
4  | N | 10 | = |
420 | 3.82 |