| 1 | 139: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
7 | EW |
4  | E |  A | -2 |
200 | -8.14 |
| 1 | 139: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
8 | EW |
3  | N |  A | = |
110 | -0.77 |
| 1 | 139: J. Bejma - P. Siekański, 9.0, MA |
9 | EW |
3  | S | 7 | -2 |
-100 | 5.79 |
| 2 | 142: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
4 | E | 2 | = |
-620 | 6.79 |
| 2 | 142: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
1 | E | 4 | +3 |
-180 | 0.91 |
| 2 | 142: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
3 | E | 6 | +1 |
-430 | 5.60 |
| 3 | 137: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
16 | NS |
4 | N | A | +2 |
480 | 1.15 |
| 3 | 137: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
17 | NS |
5 | N | 3 | +1 |
420 | -0.13 |
| 3 | 137: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
18 | NS |
1 | N | 2 | +2 |
150 | -8.76 |
| 4 | 143: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
10 | EW |
3 | E | 2 | -3 |
300 | -8.21 |
| 4 | 143: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
11 | EW |
2 | N | 7 | +1 |
140 | -1.23 |
| 4 | 143: R. Werbanowski - S. Cieśla, 0.0, |
12 | EW |
4 | N | 3 | +1 |
650 | -0.85 |
| 5 | 141: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
25 | NS |
6 | W | 6 | = |
-1440 | -13.55 |
| 5 | 141: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
26 | NS |
5 | E | 7 | = |
-650 | 1.64 |
| 5 | 141: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 2.0, MA |
27 | NS |
4 | W | 10 | +1 |
-450 | -1.17 |
| 6 | 136: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
19 | EW |
4 | E | K | +1 |
-650 | 3.39 |
| 6 | 136: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
20 | EW |
3 | S | 2 | -4 |
-400 | 6.90 |
| 6 | 136: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 3.0, MA |
21 | EW |
5 | N | 7 | = |
600 | -1.52 |
| 7 | 135: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
4 | EW |
4 | S | 5 | -1 |
-100 | 4.45 |
| 7 | 135: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
5 | EW |
2 | N | 5 | +1 |
140 | -2.82 |
| 7 | 135: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
6 | EW |
3 | E | Q | -1 |
100 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 138: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
22 | NS |
4 | W | 8 | -2 |
200 | 6.13 |
| 8 | 138: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
23 | NS |
4 x | E | A | -2 |
500 | 8.72 |
| 8 | 138: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
24 | NS |
3 | S | 10 | -3 |
-150 | -9.01 |
| 9 | 144: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
1 | NS |
4 | N | 8 | -1 |
-50 | -8.87 |
| 9 | 144: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
2 | NS |
2 | E | 5 | +2 |
-170 | 1.11 |
| 9 | 144: Z. Szuchnik - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
3 | NS |
1 | W | Q | +1 |
-120 | -0.21 |
