| 1 | 488: M. Tomczewska - K. Markiewicz, 9.0, PM |
1 | EW |
5  | W | K | -4 |
200 | 4.09 |
| 1 | 488: M. Tomczewska - K. Markiewicz, 9.0, PM |
2 | EW |
3  | E | K | -1 |
50 | -3.46 |
| 1 | 488: M. Tomczewska - K. Markiewicz, 9.0, PM |
3 | EW |
3  | S | 2 | +2 |
460 | -1.59 |
| 1 | 488: M. Tomczewska - K. Markiewicz, 9.0, PM |
4 | EW |
1  | W | 2 | +2 |
-150 | 1.22 |
| 2 | 483: A. Lonski - A. Twardowski, 20.0, PM/DS |
13 | EW |
6  | W | 2 | +1 |
-1460 | 9.24 |
| 2 | 483: A. Lonski - A. Twardowski, 20.0, PM/DS |
14 | EW |
2  | N | 3 | +2 |
170 | -1.47 |
| 2 | 483: A. Lonski - A. Twardowski, 20.0, PM/DS |
15 | EW |
2  | N | J | +3 |
210 | 2.09 |
| 2 | 483: A. Lonski - A. Twardowski, 20.0, PM/DS |
16 | EW |
4  | W | 8 | = |
-130 | -0.22 |
| 3 | 485: I. Błażejów - M. Pietrzak, 7.5, PM |
25 | EW |
6  | S | A | -1 |
-50 | 10.60 |
| 3 | 485: I. Błażejów - M. Pietrzak, 7.5, PM |
26 | EW |
3  | S | 8 | +2 |
660 | -0.43 |
| 3 | 485: I. Błażejów - M. Pietrzak, 7.5, PM |
27 | EW |
4  | E | A | +2 |
-480 | -0.91 |
| 3 | 485: I. Błażejów - M. Pietrzak, 7.5, PM |
28 | EW |
1 x | S | Q | -2 |
-500 | 6.14 |
| 4 | 487: Ł. Szuper - J. Wieczorek, 1.5, PM |
17 | NS |
4  | S | A | = |
420 | 5.83 |
| 4 | 487: Ł. Szuper - J. Wieczorek, 1.5, PM |
18 | NS |
3  | S | 10 | -3 |
-300 | -6.84 |
| 4 | 487: Ł. Szuper - J. Wieczorek, 1.5, PM |
19 | NS |
4  | E | 4 | = |
-620 | -2.19 |
| 4 | 487: Ł. Szuper - J. Wieczorek, 1.5, PM |
20 | NS |
2  | W | 10 | = |
-110 | -2.22 |
| 5 | 482: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 1.5, PM |
21 | EW |
3  | N | A | +1 |
170 | 6.87 |
| 5 | 482: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 1.5, PM |
22 | EW |
2  | W | 7 | +1 |
-140 | 1.87 |
| 5 | 482: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 1.5, PM |
23 | EW |
4  | S | 8 | +1 |
150 | 2.57 |
| 5 | 482: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 1.5, PM |
24 | EW |
4  | E | 10 | -1 |
50 | -1.70 |
| 6 | 484: K. Kluf - M. Banasiński, 26.0, WP |
9 | NS |
2  | W | 6 | = |
-110 | -0.11 |
| 6 | 484: K. Kluf - M. Banasiński, 26.0, WP |
10 | NS |
4 x | N | 10 | -1 |
-200 | -4.97 |
| 6 | 484: K. Kluf - M. Banasiński, 26.0, WP |
11 | NS |
3  | S | 2 | = |
140 | -0.24 |
| 6 | 484: K. Kluf - M. Banasiński, 26.0, WP |
12 | NS |
3  | N | 7 | +3 |
690 | -3.08 |
| 7 | 486: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 9.0, PM |
5 | NS |
4  | N | J | +1 |
650 | 3.48 |
| 7 | 486: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 9.0, PM |
6 | NS |
2  | N | K | = |
110 | 1.30 |
| 7 | 486: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 9.0, PM |
7 | NS |
4  | N | 2 | +1 |
650 | 6.29 |
| 7 | 486: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 9.0, PM |
8 | NS |
3  | N | 3 | +1 |
430 | 0.27 |