| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
1 | EW |
4  | S | 7 | +1 |
450 | 25.27 |
| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
2 | EW |
4  | S | 6 | +1 |
650 | 30.77 |
| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
3 | EW |
2  | S | J | +2 |
130 | 11.54 |
| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
4 | EW |
4  | W | K | -1 |
100 | 3.85 |
| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
5 | EW |
3  | S | 2 | +1 |
630 | 15.56 |
| 1 | 108: A. Toeplitz - A. Osiński, 11.0, PM |
6 | EW |
3  | E | 3 | -1 |
100 | 35.00 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
7 | NS |
2  | E | Q | +4 |
-240 | 9.34 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
8 | NS |
3 x | W | 6 | -5 |
1100 | 99.45 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
9 | NS |
3  | W | 7 | = |
-600 | 48.35 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
10 | NS |
4  | E | 2 | +1 |
-650 | 74.18 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
11 | NS |
5 x | N | 6 | -2 |
-300 | 42.31 |
| 2 | 105: R. Góralczyk - P. Gruszczyński, 16.0, PM/WP |
12 | NS |
3  | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 67.03 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
13 | NS |
4  | S | 8 | +2 |
680 | 65.38 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
14 | NS |
2 x | W | 3 | = |
-470 | 0.02 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
15 | NS |
3  | S | 6 | +2 |
660 | 52.22 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
16 | NS |
2  | E | 4 | -2 |
200 | 64.84 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
17 | NS |
3 x | W | K | +2 |
-670 | 1.10 |
| 3 | 107: K. Gralak - L. Szkudlarek, 27.0, PM |
18 | NS |
4  | E | 6 | +1 |
-450 | 40.11 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
19 | EW |
3  | W | 4 | = |
-600 | 70.33 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
20 | EW |
3  | S | J | -2 |
-200 | 97.77 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
21 | EW |
3  | W | 6 | = |
-400 | 88.88 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
22 | EW |
4  | S | 8 | +2 |
480 | 49.45 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
23 | EW |
2  | S | J | = |
110 | 35.16 |
| 4 | 104: W. Kocoń - J. Kajzer, 12.0, PM |
24 | EW |
4  | N | 6 | +2 |
480 | 9.45 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
25 | EW |
2  | S | K | +1 |
140 | 8.19 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
26 | EW |
4  | E | 3 | -2 |
200 | 37.99 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
27 | EW |
1  | N | K | = |
90 | 2.38 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
28 | EW |
3 x | E | K | -1 |
100 | 83.01 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
29 | EW |
3  | N | 3 | -4 |
-400 | 90.44 |
| 5 | 106: M. Niesłuchowski - D. Podfigurny, 12.0, PM |
30 | EW |
4  | E | K | +1 |
-450 | 68.20 |