| 527: L. Mielczarek - W. Wrześniowski, 21.0, WM |
| EW |
4  | S |  J | -1 |
-50 | 84.71 |
| 527: L. Mielczarek - W. Wrześniowski, 21.0, WM |
| EW |
2  | W |  5 | = |
-120 | 61.71 |
| 527: L. Mielczarek - W. Wrześniowski, 21.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 27.21 |
| 527: L. Mielczarek - W. Wrześniowski, 21.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | N |  A | = |
620 | 13.12 |
| 527: L. Mielczarek - W. Wrześniowski, 21.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | E | 4 | -1 |
50 | 63.33 |
| 524: S. Nowotka - W. Niewiara, 9.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | E | J | -1 |
100 | 39.92 |
| 524: S. Nowotka - W. Niewiara, 9.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | S | 5 | -3 |
-300 | 94.89 |
| 524: S. Nowotka - W. Niewiara, 9.0, WM |
| EW |
4 | W | 6 | +1 |
-450 | 25.76 |
| 524: S. Nowotka - W. Niewiara, 9.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | W | K | +2 |
-170 | 87.74 |
| 524: S. Nowotka - W. Niewiara, 9.0, WM |
| EW |
6 | N | 9 | = |
1430 | 3.87 |
| 526: R. Ostapczuk - T. Więckiewicz, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
4 | N | 5 | -2 |
-100 | 34.59 |
| 526: R. Ostapczuk - T. Więckiewicz, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
2 | E | 5 | = |
-110 | 53.44 |
| 526: R. Ostapczuk - T. Więckiewicz, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
1 | N | 7 | -3 |
-300 | 11.43 |
| 526: R. Ostapczuk - T. Więckiewicz, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
3 x | W | 2 | -2 |
300 | 100.00 |
| 526: R. Ostapczuk - T. Więckiewicz, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
4 | E | 7 | = |
-420 | 15.47 |
| 522: D. Czuba - A. Sobolewski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | E | 3 | +1 |
-170 | 56.58 |
| 522: D. Czuba - A. Sobolewski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | S | 8 | -2 |
-100 | 43.84 |
| 522: D. Czuba - A. Sobolewski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | W | 5 | +1 |
-430 | 82.13 |
| 522: D. Czuba - A. Sobolewski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | N | 4 | = |
400 | 88.36 |
| 522: D. Czuba - A. Sobolewski, 0.0, |
| EW |
3 | N | 8 | = |
600 | 90.52 |
| 528: J. Borowiński - B. Lesiński, 20.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | N | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 78.10 |
| 528: J. Borowiński - B. Lesiński, 20.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | S | 8 | = |
90 | 39.15 |
| 528: J. Borowiński - B. Lesiński, 20.0, WM |
| EW |
5 | S | 5 | = |
650 | 24.24 |
| 528: J. Borowiński - B. Lesiński, 20.0, WM |
| EW |
3 x | E | 4 | = |
-550 | 93.66 |
| 528: J. Borowiński - B. Lesiński, 20.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | N | 7 | -2 |
-100 | 11.07 |
| 523: J. Jurczenko - W. Walkiewicz, 2.5, -/WM |
| NS |
1 | N | 6 | = |
90 | 41.21 |
| 523: J. Jurczenko - W. Walkiewicz, 2.5, -/WM |
| NS |
3 | N | 8 | +2 |
460 | 57.12 |
| 523: J. Jurczenko - W. Walkiewicz, 2.5, -/WM |
| NS |
6 | W | J | +1 |
-940 | 16.39 |
| 523: J. Jurczenko - W. Walkiewicz, 2.5, -/WM |
| NS |
4 | E | A | +1 |
-650 | 82.65 |
| 521: W. Czarkowski - S. Jankowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | E | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 86.75 |
| 521: W. Czarkowski - S. Jankowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
5 x | N | 4 | = |
850 | 84.87 |
| 521: W. Czarkowski - S. Jankowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | N | 6 | = |
420 | 80.35 |
| 521: W. Czarkowski - S. Jankowski, 0.0, |
| NS |
4 | N | A | +2 |
480 | 50.75 |
