| 1 | 223: M. Nowaczyński - A. Ciechomski, 12.0, MA |
1 | EW |
2  | W | K | -1 |
50 | 14.96 |
| 1 | 223: M. Nowaczyński - A. Ciechomski, 12.0, MA |
2 | EW |
3  | S | 3 | +2 |
660 | 36.25 |
| 1 | 223: M. Nowaczyński - A. Ciechomski, 12.0, MA |
3 | EW |
3  | W | A | -1 |
100 | 71.69 |
| 2 | 236: T. Kozłowski - K. Stefaniak, 9.0, MA |
22 | NS |
6  | S | A | = |
980 | 69.13 |
| 2 | 236: T. Kozłowski - K. Stefaniak, 9.0, MA |
23 | NS |
3  | W | 3 | -4 |
400 | 98.20 |
| 2 | 236: T. Kozłowski - K. Stefaniak, 9.0, MA |
24 | NS |
2  | S | Q | -2 |
-100 | 54.68 |
| 3 | 231: M. Mączewski - S. Cieślak, 16.0, MA |
19 | EW |
2  | N | K | -2 |
-100 | 45.95 |
| 3 | 231: M. Mączewski - S. Cieślak, 16.0, MA |
20 | EW |
2  | E | A | +1 |
-140 | 57.36 |
| 3 | 231: M. Mączewski - S. Cieślak, 16.0, MA |
21 | EW |
3  | S | 4 | +2 |
660 | 13.36 |
| 4 | 235: M. Tuczyński - A. Fengler, 9.0, MA |
13 | NS |
2  | W | A | +3 |
-200 | 88.37 |
| 4 | 235: M. Tuczyński - A. Fengler, 9.0, MA |
14 | NS |
3  | N | 5 | = |
400 | 48.80 |
| 4 | 235: M. Tuczyński - A. Fengler, 9.0, MA |
15 | NS |
2  | W | Q | +1 |
-150 | 35.05 |
| 5 | 230: A. Parafianowicz - J. Popowicz, 0.0, |
16 | EW |
3  | E | 3 | +1 |
-630 | 60.54 |
| 5 | 230: A. Parafianowicz - J. Popowicz, 0.0, |
17 | EW |
3  | S | J | -1 |
-50 | 65.56 |
| 5 | 230: A. Parafianowicz - J. Popowicz, 0.0, |
18 | EW |
3 x | S | 7 | -1 |
-200 | 92.32 |
| 6 | 226: D. Zembrzuski - I. Grynczewski, 22.0, MA |
25 | NS |
4 x | E | J | -1 |
200 | 67.51 |
| 6 | 226: D. Zembrzuski - I. Grynczewski, 22.0, MA |
26 | NS |
3  | N | K | +3 |
170 | 54.04 |
| 6 | 226: D. Zembrzuski - I. Grynczewski, 22.0, MA |
27 | NS |
5  | W | Q | +1 |
-480 | 80.82 |
| 7 | 232: J. Gajda - A. Wilk, 6.5, MA |
4 | NS |
3  | S | K | = |
140 | 83.38 |
| 7 | 232: J. Gajda - A. Wilk, 6.5, MA |
5 | NS |
3  | W | 6 | = |
-400 | 48.04 |
| 7 | 232: J. Gajda - A. Wilk, 6.5, MA |
6 | NS |
4  | N | A | +1 |
450 | 76.43 |
| 8 | 228: M. Borkowski - W. Wieremiejczyk, 5.0, MA |
28 | NS |
2  | E | 8 | +1 |
-110 | 46.71 |
| 8 | 228: M. Borkowski - W. Wieremiejczyk, 5.0, MA |
29 | NS |
4  | N | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 4.17 |
| 8 | 228: M. Borkowski - W. Wieremiejczyk, 5.0, MA |
30 | NS |
2  | N | 9 | +1 |
140 | 68.16 |
| 9 | 234: M. Salak - K. Salak, 3.5, MA |
10 | EW |
3  | W | Q | -1 |
100 | 37.95 |
| 9 | 234: M. Salak - K. Salak, 3.5, MA |
11 | EW |
2 x | N | K | -1 |
-100 | 25.23 |
| 9 | 234: M. Salak - K. Salak, 3.5, MA |
12 | EW |
4  | W | A | -1 |
50 | 25.91 |
| 10 | 233: J. Stępiński - M. Czajkowska, 25.0, MA |
7 | EW |
4  | E | J | -1 |
100 | 27.11 |
| 10 | 233: J. Stępiński - M. Czajkowska, 25.0, MA |
8 | EW |
4  | N | Q | = |
420 | 50.30 |
| 10 | 233: J. Stępiński - M. Czajkowska, 25.0, MA |
9 | EW |
3  | E | A | +2 |
-200 | 30.15 |