| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
1 | NS |
2  | E | 10 | +2 |
-170 | 88.67 |
| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
2 | NS |
4  | N | A | +1 |
650 | 51.80 |
| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
3 | NS |
5 x | E | K | -2 |
500 | 83.51 |
| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
4 | NS |
4  | W | A | +2 |
-680 | 16.13 |
| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
2  | S | 6 | -3 |
-300 | 16.25 |
| 1 | 558: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
2  | N | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 54.09 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
7 | EW |
4  | W | 6 | = |
-620 | 89.82 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
8 | EW |
3  | E | 5 | = |
-400 | 77.42 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
9 | EW |
2  | E | 9 | +1 |
-150 | 63.08 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
10 | EW |
6  | S | 10 | -2 |
-200 | 95.18 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
11 | EW |
4  | W | 10 | = |
-420 | 85.94 |
| 2 | 555: T. Mediuch - W. Glina, 1.5, ZP/- |
12 | EW |
2  | N | J | -2 |
-200 | 82.38 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
13 | EW |
5  | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 19.93 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
14 | EW |
2  | W | 6 | = |
-110 | 78.75 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
15 | EW |
4  | S | 2 | = |
620 | 34.41 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
3  | N | J | = |
140 | 29.93 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
3  | E | 6 | +3 |
-490 | 46.07 |
| 3 | 556: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
7  | E | 6 | = |
-1510 | 60.57 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
2  | S | Q | = |
90 | 72.78 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
2  | N | A | +1 |
110 | 39.68 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
2  | W | A | +1 |
-140 | 52.86 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
4  | W | K | +1 |
-650 | 90.36 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
4  | N | 8 | -1 |
-100 | 84.88 |
| 4 | 553: E. Kaczmarek - W. Mateńko, 15.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
4  | E | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 75.54 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
25 | NS |
4  | N | K | = |
420 | 84.14 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
26 | NS |
5  | E | K | = |
-600 | 27.99 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
27 | NS |
3  | N | 7 | +4 |
520 | 82.88 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
28 | NS |
3  | E | Q | = |
-400 | 65.76 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
29 | NS |
4  | N | 10 | = |
620 | 86.24 |
| 5 | 554: K. Orzechowski - H. Pakuła, 10.0, ZP |
30 | NS |
4  | W | 3 | -2 |
100 | 89.39 |