| 1 | 581: K. Orzechowski - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
1 | NS |
3  | N |  6 | -1 |
-50 | 23.65 |
| 1 | 581: K. Orzechowski - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
2 | NS |
3 | W |  3 | -2 |
100 | 46.04 |
| 1 | 581: K. Orzechowski - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
3 | NS |
4  | S |  J | = |
420 | 64.39 |
| 1 | 581: K. Orzechowski - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
4 | NS |
3 | S | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 86.74 |
| 2 | 582: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
4 | E | J | +1 |
-450 | 33.99 |
| 2 | 582: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
4 | N | 5 | = |
420 | 88.08 |
| 2 | 582: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
4 | N | 5 | = |
620 | 63.62 |
| 2 | 582: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
4 | W | 9 | = |
-420 | 22.84 |
| 3 | 583: W. Glina - T. Mediuch, 1.5, -/ZP |
9 | NS |
3 | N | K | -1 |
-50 | 37.59 |
| 3 | 583: W. Glina - T. Mediuch, 1.5, -/ZP |
10 | NS |
3 | N | 8 | +2 |
660 | 88.99 |
| 3 | 583: W. Glina - T. Mediuch, 1.5, -/ZP |
11 | NS |
4 | N | 10 | = |
420 | 87.63 |
| 3 | 583: W. Glina - T. Mediuch, 1.5, -/ZP |
12 | NS |
2 | E | J | -1 |
50 | 50.90 |
| 4 | 584: B. Maryńczak - B. Drozd, 9.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
4 | W | K | -3 |
300 | 94.62 |
| 4 | 584: B. Maryńczak - B. Drozd, 9.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
2 | N | 7 | = |
90 | 57.71 |
| 4 | 584: B. Maryńczak - B. Drozd, 9.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
1 | W | J | +1 |
-120 | 39.43 |
| 4 | 584: B. Maryńczak - B. Drozd, 9.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
3 | E | 8 | -3 |
300 | 66.73 |
| 5 | 585: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
17 | NS |
2 | W | K | = |
-110 | 23.04 |
| 5 | 585: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
18 | NS |
2 | W | Q | +3 |
-200 | 92.83 |
| 5 | 585: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
19 | NS |
2 | E | 10 | +4 |
-170 | 76.79 |
| 5 | 585: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
20 | NS |
3 | W | A | -2 |
200 | 96.41 |
| 6 | 586: H. Pakuła - M. Sankiewicz, 10.0, ZP |
21 | NS |
4 | S | K | +2 |
680 | 68.57 |
| 6 | 586: H. Pakuła - M. Sankiewicz, 10.0, ZP |
22 | NS |
3 | E | 3 | +1 |
-630 | 80.18 |
| 6 | 586: H. Pakuła - M. Sankiewicz, 10.0, ZP |
23 | NS |
2 | N | 5 | +1 |
140 | 62.10 |
| 6 | 586: H. Pakuła - M. Sankiewicz, 10.0, ZP |
24 | NS |
5 | S | A | = |
400 | 72.68 |
| 7 | 587: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
25 | NS |
3 | S | Q | = |
400 | 28.21 |
| 7 | 587: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
26 | NS |
3 | E | A | = |
-140 | 34.64 |
| 7 | 587: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
27 | NS |
3 | S | A | -2 |
-100 | 26.08 |
| 7 | 587: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
28 | NS |
3 | S | 6 | +2 |
660 | 68.98 |
