| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
2  | S | 3 | = |
110 | 62.32 |
| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
3 | E |  K | +2 |
-200 | 46.51 |
| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
6  | N | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 89.10 |
| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
4 | E | 9 | -2 |
200 | 11.49 |
| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
3  | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 92.13 |
| 1 | 472: W. Augoff - K. Bajno, 3.5, WM |
| EW |
3 | S | T | +1 |
430 | 25.00 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
1 | W | 3 | +3 |
-180 | 97.05 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
4  | N | 7 | = |
130 | 55.62 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | N | 4 | +1 |
430 | 21.19 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
2 | W | 2 | = |
-110 | 64.00 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
1 | E | J | +2 |
-150 | 93.57 |
| 2 | 469: J. Gruchacz - W. Olender, 0.0, NZ |
| EW |
3 | W | A | +1 |
-130 | 82.26 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | N | A | = |
420 | 84.16 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | N | A | = |
620 | 74.86 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
1 | W | 4 | +1 |
-120 | 41.99 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | W | 5 | -2 |
100 | 93.54 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
4 | N | J | -2 |
-200 | 20.39 |
| 2 | 470: J. Barański - J. Puchalski, 4.5, WM |
| NS |
2 | N | K | +4 |
230 | 48.63 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | W | 4 | +1 |
-170 | 51.40 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
5 | N | 8 | +1 |
480 | 67.70 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
2 | W | J | = |
-120 | 25.98 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
3 x | N | A | -2 |
-300 | 80.25 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
3 | E | 9 | -1 |
50 | 46.10 |
| 3 | 471: J. Romot - A. Poreda, 12.0, WM |
| EW |
5 x | S | K | -1 |
-200 | 89.49 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-110 | 14.25 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
2 | S | K | +1 |
140 | 76.53 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | S | Q | = |
600 | 64.86 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
2 | E | 4 | = |
-110 | 42.24 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | S | 3 | -2 |
-200 | 15.10 |
| 3 | 468: T. Banach - K. Targoński, 9.0, WM |
| NS |
3 | E | 7 | = |
-110 | 22.70 |
