| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
2  | N | | = |
110 | 0.06 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
3  | N | | +2 |
660 | 37.94 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
5  | W | | -1 |
100 | 3.50 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
2 x | N | | -3 |
-800 | 99.94 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
4  | E | | +1 |
-450 | 75.00 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
1  | S | | +1 |
120 | 5.00 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
3  | E | | -1 |
100 | 10.00 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
3  | N | | -1 |
-50 | 75.83 |
| 1 | 55: W. Ligman - D. Piotrzkowski, 1.5, PM |
| EW |
3  | N | | +1 |
430 | 26.67 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
3  | N | | = |
600 | 11.67 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
1  | N | | -1 |
-50 | 58.33 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
3  | S | | -1 |
-100 | 71.67 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
2  | N | | = |
120 | 43.33 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
2  | N | | = |
110 | 45.00 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
5  | E | | = |
-400 | 20.00 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
2  | W | | = |
-90 | 70.00 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
4  | N | | = |
420 | 81.67 |
| 2 | 53: R. Lipka - P. Petka, 0.0, PM |
| EW |
1  | W | | = |
-90 | 65.50 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | N | | -1 |
-50 | 8.33 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | W | | +2 |
-680 | 63.33 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
4  | E | | -3 |
150 | 96.67 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
2  | E | | +3 |
-200 | 77.56 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | S | | +1 |
630 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | E | | +1 |
-430 | 26.67 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
2  | W | | +1 |
-140 | 38.33 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
1  | S | | = |
80 | 33.33 |
| 3 | 54: M. Cymanowski - A. Laska, 0.0, |
| NS |
3  | N | | +3 |
490 | 35.00 |