| 1 | 462: Ł. Gackowski - J. Wieczorek, 2.5, PM |
19 | EW |
3  | S |  3 | -2 |
-100 | 90.56 |
| 1 | 462: Ł. Gackowski - J. Wieczorek, 2.5, PM |
20 | EW |
3  | W |  Q | +1 |
-170 | 72.88 |
| 1 | 462: Ł. Gackowski - J. Wieczorek, 2.5, PM |
21 | EW |
7 | E | 2 | = |
-1510 | 62.03 |
| 2 | 463: M. Banasiński - K. Kluf, 26.0, WP |
22 | EW |
5 x | E | K | -2 |
500 | 15.00 |
| 2 | 463: M. Banasiński - K. Kluf, 26.0, WP |
23 | EW |
2  x | E | 7 | -1 |
200 | 22.49 |
| 2 | 463: M. Banasiński - K. Kluf, 26.0, WP |
24 | EW |
6 | W | 3 | -1 |
50 | 4.55 |
| 3 | 464: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 2.5, -/PM |
25 | EW |
4 | E | 4 | -2 |
200 | 47.48 |
| 3 | 464: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 2.5, -/PM |
26 | EW |
1 | E | 5 | +1 |
-120 | 50.93 |
| 3 | 464: A. Rychły-Lipińska - Z. Rychły, 2.5, -/PM |
27 | EW |
4 | N | 6 | = |
420 | 57.68 |
| 4 | 465: I. Błażejów - J. Kondej, 0.0, pm/- |
28 | EW |
5 x | W | 10 | -4 |
800 | 61.41 |
| 4 | 465: I. Błażejów - J. Kondej, 0.0, pm/- |
29 | EW |
3 | S | K | -1 |
-100 | 41.18 |
| 4 | 465: I. Błażejów - J. Kondej, 0.0, pm/- |
30 | EW |
3 | S | K | = |
140 | 19.25 |
| 5 | 466: B. Dyk - K. Drobiniak-Całka, 17.0, PM |
1 | EW |
3 | W | Q | = |
-140 | 54.72 |
| 5 | 466: B. Dyk - K. Drobiniak-Całka, 17.0, PM |
2 | EW |
3 | S | 9 | +3 |
690 | 41.01 |
| 5 | 466: B. Dyk - K. Drobiniak-Całka, 17.0, PM |
3 | EW |
2 | E | Q | +1 |
-140 | 73.42 |
| 6 | 467: M. Stasiński - W. Maciejewski, 8.0, PM |
4 | EW |
4 | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 30.83 |
| 6 | 467: M. Stasiński - W. Maciejewski, 8.0, PM |
5 | EW |
4 | E | 2 | = |
-420 | 44.30 |
| 6 | 467: M. Stasiński - W. Maciejewski, 8.0, PM |
6 | EW |
2 x | E | A | = |
-180 | 99.84 |
| 7 | 468: M. Rudziński - K. Markiewicz, 0.5, PM/- |
7 | EW |
4 x | S | 10 | -1 |
-200 | 63.92 |
| 7 | 468: M. Rudziński - K. Markiewicz, 0.5, PM/- |
8 | EW |
4 | S | 4 | +2 |
480 | 51.42 |
| 7 | 468: M. Rudziński - K. Markiewicz, 0.5, PM/- |
9 | EW |
4 | W | 2 | +1 |
-150 | 89.59 |
| 8 | 459: Ł. Szuper - K. Wandzel, 1.0, PM/- |
10 | EW |
3 | N | Q | = |
600 | 47.48 |
| 8 | 459: Ł. Szuper - K. Wandzel, 1.0, PM/- |
11 | EW |
6 x | W | 9 | = |
-1210 | 93.51 |
| 8 | 459: Ł. Szuper - K. Wandzel, 1.0, PM/- |
12 | EW |
3 | E | 2 | +1 |
-430 | 82.12 |
| 9 | 460: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 8.0, PM |
13 | EW |
4 | E | 3 | -1 |
100 | 42.11 |
| 9 | 460: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 8.0, PM |
14 | EW |
2 | E | K | -1 |
50 | 76.58 |
| 9 | 460: G. Gan - K. Boniek, 8.0, PM |
15 | EW |
2 | S | A | = |
110 | 57.89 |
| 10 | 461: A. Lonski - M. Pietrzak, 16.0, PM/PK |
16 | EW |
3 | S | 7 | = |
140 | 67.55 |
| 10 | 461: A. Lonski - M. Pietrzak, 16.0, PM/PK |
17 | EW |
4 | S | 5 | +2 |
480 | 89.69 |
| 10 | 461: A. Lonski - M. Pietrzak, 16.0, PM/PK |
18 | EW |
4 | N | A | = |
620 | 19.59 |
