| 1 | 60: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
10 | NS |
3  | W |  3 | +1 |
-630 | -1.64 |
| 1 | 60: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
11 | NS |
3 | S |  4 | +1 |
430 | 2.89 |
| 1 | 60: D. Krogul - S. Grzenda, 0.0, |
12 | NS |
3  | W | 4 | +3 |
-230 | 4.92 |
| 2 | 62: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 1.0, MA |
4 | EW |
2 | E | A | = |
-110 | 4.44 |
| 2 | 62: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 1.0, MA |
5 | EW |
1 | W |  4 | -1 |
50 | -0.39 |
| 2 | 62: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 1.0, MA |
6 | EW |
3 | N | 4 | +4 |
520 | -0.05 |
| 3 | 61: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
19 | NS |
3 | S | 5 | = |
400 | 3.57 |
| 3 | 61: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
20 | NS |
2 | E | 6 | -1 |
100 | -0.02 |
| 3 | 61: M. Lipka - L. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
21 | NS |
5 xx | E | K | -2 |
600 | 11.84 |
| 4 | 56: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
1 | W | K | = |
-90 | 1.46 |
| 4 | 56: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
3 | N | 3 | = |
110 | -3.39 |
| 4 | 56: M. Ciszewski - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
4 | W | A | +1 |
-450 | 1.02 |
| 5 | 58: S. Cieśla - M. Grzenda, 0.0, |
25 | EW |
3 | S | K | -1 |
-50 | 0.51 |
| 5 | 58: S. Cieśla - M. Grzenda, 0.0, |
26 | EW |
4 | E | A | = |
-620 | 1.93 |
| 5 | 58: S. Cieśla - M. Grzenda, 0.0, |
27 | EW |
2 | W | 8 | = |
-110 | 4.95 |
| 6 | 53: A. Szostak - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
16 | NS |
3 | S | 6 | = |
140 | -1.38 |
| 6 | 53: A. Szostak - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
17 | NS |
4 | W | 10 | +1 |
-450 | -2.05 |
| 6 | 53: A. Szostak - R. Werbanowski, 0.0, |
18 | NS |
5 | W | 9 | +1 |
-420 | -1.39 |
| 7 | 55: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 1.5, MA |
22 | NS |
3 | E | 6 | +3 |
-690 | 4.75 |
| 7 | 55: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 1.5, MA |
23 | NS |
4 | E | 10 | +2 |
-690 | -1.26 |
| 7 | 55: P. Drozdowski - M. Kaczorek, 1.5, MA |
24 | NS |
5 x | N | A | -3 |
-500 | -4.38 |
| 8 | 57: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 8.0, MA |
1 | EW |
1 | N | 4 | +1 |
120 | -3.28 |
| 8 | 57: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 8.0, MA |
2 | EW |
4 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 6.07 |
| 8 | 57: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 8.0, MA |
3 | EW |
3 | S | 3 | -1 |
-50 | 0.93 |
| 9 | 54: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
7 | EW |
6 | E | 5 | -2 |
200 | -12.11 |
| 9 | 54: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
8 | EW |
2 | E | A | = |
-110 | 1.20 |
| 9 | 54: B. Stankiewicz - Z. Szuchnik, 4.0, -/MA |
9 | EW |
3 | W | 5 | +1 |
-630 | 4.02 |
