| 1 | 27: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
6  | S |  2 | = |
1370 | 82.48 |
| 1 | 27: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2  | E | 7 | -1 |
50 | 59.99 |
| 1 | 27: J. Maruszewski - R. Kiełkiewicz, 8.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | E | K | +2 |
-130 | 32.51 |
| 2 | 32: M. Maszenda - K. Falkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
5 | S |  6 | = |
600 | 17.07 |
| 2 | 32: M. Maszenda - K. Falkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | W | 2 | +2 |
-480 | 45.12 |
| 2 | 32: M. Maszenda - K. Falkowski, 7.0, MA |
| EW |
3  x | N | 10 | +2 |
1150 | 5.18 |
| 3 | 23: J. Maszenda - T. Gawroński, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | W | 3 | +1 |
-630 | 57.32 |
| 3 | 23: J. Maszenda - T. Gawroński, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | N | 4 | +2 |
460 | 12.20 |
| 3 | 23: J. Maszenda - T. Gawroński, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
3 | E | 8 | +2 |
-460 | 92.68 |
| 4 | 25: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | S | 6 | = |
400 | 93.90 |
| 4 | 25: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | K | +1 |
-130 | 25.61 |
| 4 | 25: J. Pęcherzewska - L. Pęcherzewski, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
4 | W | 3 | = |
-420 | 67.07 |
| 5 | 29: J. Szczygieł - I. Głowacki, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 50.00 |
| 5 | 29: J. Szczygieł - I. Głowacki, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
4 | E | 4 | +1 |
-450 | 46.25 |
| 5 | 29: J. Szczygieł - I. Głowacki, 6.0, MA |
| EW |
1 | N | 4 | +3 |
180 | 21.95 |
| 6 | 31: A. Marciniak - M. Krowicki, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
3 | E | 8 | -2 |
100 | 29.51 |
| 6 | 31: A. Marciniak - M. Krowicki, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
1 | W | 10 | = |
-90 | 21.83 |
| 6 | 31: A. Marciniak - M. Krowicki, 6.5, MA |
| NS |
1 | W | Q | +3 |
-180 | 38.76 |
| 7 | 30: G. Górecki - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
5 x | S | Q | -3 |
-500 | 93.90 |
| 7 | 30: G. Górecki - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
2 | N | 4 | +1 |
150 | 13.41 |
| 7 | 30: G. Górecki - S. Tyndorf, 5.5, MA |
| EW |
4 | S | 9 | +2 |
480 | 51.22 |
| 8 | 26: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 2.5, MA/- |
| EW |
2 | W | 5 | -1 |
100 | 54.88 |
| 8 | 26: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 2.5, MA/- |
| EW |
4 | S | A | -2 |
-100 | 76.83 |
| 8 | 26: J. Słomski - J. Dankowski, 2.5, MA/- |
| EW |
6 | N | K | = |
980 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 28: W. Skupiński - Z. Słomski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
3 | N | Q | +4 |
520 | 13.41 |
| 9 | 28: W. Skupiński - Z. Słomski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | S | J | +3 |
200 | 20.73 |
| 9 | 28: W. Skupiński - Z. Słomski, 4.0, MA |
| NS |
2 | N | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 30.49 |
