| 1 | 584: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
17 | NS |
6  | E | 4 | -1 |
50 | 90.00 |
| 1 | 584: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
18 | NS |
4 x | E | 2 | -2 |
300 | 80.00 |
| 1 | 584: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
19 | NS |
5 x | S | 3 | -2 |
-300 | 83.55 |
| 1 | 584: L. Błaziński - E. Kaczmarek, 23.0, ZP |
20 | NS |
2 x | W | 10 | = |
-690 | 2.25 |
| 2 | 579: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
1  | E | 2 | +4 |
-210 | 35.11 |
| 2 | 579: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
2  | S | K | -2 |
-100 | 75.48 |
| 2 | 579: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
5  | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 32.26 |
| 2 | 579: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
3  | N | 5 | +2 |
460 | 88.39 |
| 3 | 586: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
6  | W | 7 | = |
-1440 | 97.40 |
| 3 | 586: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
3  | S | J | +1 |
130 | 86.69 |
| 3 | 586: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
6  | W | 3 | = |
-920 | 75.73 |
| 3 | 586: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
3  | W | J | = |
-110 | 53.73 |
| 4 | 583: W. Korbutowicz - A. Żmuda, 9.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
2  | E | K | = |
-110 | 63.34 |
| 4 | 583: W. Korbutowicz - A. Żmuda, 9.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
4  | S | K | -1 |
-50 | 83.12 |
| 4 | 583: W. Korbutowicz - A. Żmuda, 9.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
1  | W | 2 | +1 |
-110 | 48.71 |
| 4 | 583: W. Korbutowicz - A. Żmuda, 9.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
2  | S | J | -2 |
-100 | 45.32 |
| 5 | 585: K. Wiliński - B. Wiliński, 9.5, ZP |
5 | EW |
3  | W | 5 | = |
-400 | 80.97 |
| 5 | 585: K. Wiliński - B. Wiliński, 9.5, ZP |
6 | EW |
4  | E | K | = |
-620 | 90.32 |
| 5 | 585: K. Wiliński - B. Wiliński, 9.5, ZP |
7 | EW |
4  | N | Q | -2 |
-200 | 91.45 |
| 5 | 585: K. Wiliński - B. Wiliński, 9.5, ZP |
8 | EW |
3  | S | 6 | -1 |
-50 | 47.58 |
| 6 | 580: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
25 | NS |
1  | W | 6 | +1 |
-110 | 60.16 |
| 6 | 580: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
26 | NS |
3  | E | A | = |
-140 | 31.76 |
| 6 | 580: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
27 | NS |
4  | S | 10 | +2 |
480 | 42.64 |
| 6 | 580: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
28 | NS |
4  | N | 10 | -2 |
-200 | 34.24 |
| 7 | 582: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
3  | W | 6 | +1 |
-430 | 41.88 |
| 7 | 582: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
4  | W | 2 | = |
-420 | 48.86 |
| 7 | 582: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
5  | S | 5 | +1 |
420 | 31.49 |
| 7 | 582: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
3  | E | J | +2 |
-660 | 72.42 |