| 1 | 89: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 0.0, MA |
17 | EW |
2  | N | A | +1 |
140 | -2.34 |
| 1 | 89: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 0.0, MA |
18 | EW |
3  | S | 7 | +1 |
630 | -9.15 |
| 1 | 89: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 0.0, MA |
19 | EW |
5 x | S | A | -2 |
-300 | 5.04 |
| 1 | 89: A. Leśniewski - M. Bykowska, 0.0, MA |
20 | EW |
3  | E | J | +3 |
-230 | -2.24 |
| 2 | 85: J. Korwin-Mikke - B. Dziarmaga-Działyński, 4.0, -/MA |
9 | NS |
3  | S | 4 | +1 |
430 | 1.33 |
| 2 | 85: J. Korwin-Mikke - B. Dziarmaga-Działyński, 4.0, -/MA |
10 | NS |
4  | S | A | = |
620 | 8.15 |
| 2 | 85: J. Korwin-Mikke - B. Dziarmaga-Działyński, 4.0, -/MA |
11 | NS |
6  | N | 3 | -2 |
-100 | -9.03 |
| 2 | 85: J. Korwin-Mikke - B. Dziarmaga-Działyński, 4.0, -/MA |
12 | NS |
TD | | | |
| 0.00 |
| 3 | 88: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
3  | W | 8 | +1 |
-630 | 2.34 |
| 3 | 88: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
4  | S | 3 | -3 |
-150 | 4.01 |
| 3 | 88: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
6  | W | 10 | = |
-980 | 6.14 |
| 3 | 88: M. Gawin - W. Gawin, 0.0, |
16 | EW |
3  | S | 4 | -2 |
-100 | 1.94 |
| 4 | 87: J. Laszko - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
1 | NS |
4  | E | 10 | -2 |
100 | 7.85 |
| 4 | 87: J. Laszko - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
2 | NS |
4  | S | 2 | -1 |
-100 | -6.26 |
| 4 | 87: J. Laszko - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
3 | NS |
4  | N | 7 | +1 |
150 | -2.35 |
| 4 | 87: J. Laszko - G. Sitek, 0.0, |
4 | NS |
4  | S | Q | +1 |
650 | 1.70 |
| 5 | 86: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
25 | NS |
1  | W | 4 | +1 |
-120 | -1.53 |
| 5 | 86: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
26 | NS |
4  | W | Q | -1 |
100 | -2.17 |
| 5 | 86: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
27 | NS |
5  | S | A | -1 |
-50 | -5.78 |
| 5 | 86: L. Lipka - M. Lipka, 10.0, MA |
28 | NS |
5 x | S | 4 | -1 |
-200 | -3.85 |
| 6 | 83: J. Olszewski - S. Cieśla, 2.5, MA/- |
21 | EW |
4  | N | A | +2 |
680 | -1.17 |
| 6 | 83: J. Olszewski - S. Cieśla, 2.5, MA/- |
22 | EW |
6  | E | 5 | -1 |
100 | -8.92 |
| 6 | 83: J. Olszewski - S. Cieśla, 2.5, MA/- |
23 | EW |
4  | N | Q | +2 |
680 | -5.65 |
| 6 | 83: J. Olszewski - S. Cieśla, 2.5, MA/- |
24 | EW |
2  | E | 2 | +2 |
-180 | -0.38 |
| 7 | 84: J. Bejma - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
5 | EW |
2  | E | 2 | +1 |
-140 | 1.63 |
| 7 | 84: J. Bejma - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
6 | EW |
5  | E | Q | -1 |
100 | -7.27 |
| 7 | 84: J. Bejma - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
7 | EW |
3  | N | 3 | = |
600 | -5.43 |
| 7 | 84: J. Bejma - B. Stankiewicz, 4.0, MA/- |
8 | EW |
4  | E | J | -1 |
50 | -5.61 |