| 1 | 550: B. Tomaszewski - T. Mediuch, 1.0, NZ/ZP |
9 | EW |
3  | W | 10 | +1 |
-630 | 82.82 |
| 1 | 550: B. Tomaszewski - T. Mediuch, 1.0, NZ/ZP |
10 | EW |
5  | S | Q | = |
600 | 85.58 |
| 1 | 550: B. Tomaszewski - T. Mediuch, 1.0, NZ/ZP |
11 | EW |
3  | N | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 70.68 |
| 1 | 550: B. Tomaszewski - T. Mediuch, 1.0, NZ/ZP |
12 | EW |
4  | N | A | -2 |
-200 | 91.10 |
| 2 | 552: W. Mateńko - E. Kaczmarek, 15.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
4  | E | A | -5 |
250 | 15.85 |
| 2 | 552: W. Mateńko - E. Kaczmarek, 15.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
5  | N | A | = |
400 | 17.29 |
| 2 | 552: W. Mateńko - E. Kaczmarek, 15.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
2  | N | 4 | -2 |
-200 | 92.16 |
| 2 | 552: W. Mateńko - E. Kaczmarek, 15.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
2  | W | 4 | -2 |
100 | 14.87 |
| 3 | 554: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
3  | W | J | -2 |
200 | 87.03 |
| 3 | 554: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
3  | W | 2 | +3 |
-170 | 89.28 |
| 3 | 554: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
4  | N | 10 | -2 |
-200 | 8.99 |
| 3 | 554: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
6  | S | K | = |
920 | 80.15 |
| 4 | 549: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
4  | N | 5 | +1 |
450 | 40.64 |
| 4 | 549: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
3  | E | Q | = |
-400 | 86.19 |
| 4 | 549: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
3  | E | A | = |
-140 | 68.91 |
| 4 | 549: H. Pakuła - J. Sadowski, 17.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
3  | S | 4 | +1 |
630 | 33.46 |
| 5 | 551: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
6  | S | A | +1 |
1460 | 97.76 |
| 5 | 551: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
3  | E | 4 | +1 |
-130 | 72.57 |
| 5 | 551: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
6  | E | Q | -1 |
100 | 25.84 |
| 5 | 551: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
3  | E | 5 | = |
-110 | 41.54 |
| 6 | 553: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
1 | NS |
4  | N | 5 | = |
420 | 76.40 |
| 6 | 553: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
2 | NS |
4  | N | A | = |
620 | 84.46 |
| 6 | 553: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
3 | NS |
2  | S | A | = |
110 | 35.39 |
| 6 | 553: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
4 | NS |
3  | S | J | +2 |
660 | 96.08 |
| 7 | 556: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
25 | EW |
5  | E | K | +1 |
-620 | 74.07 |
| 7 | 556: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
26 | EW |
2  | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 20.52 |
| 7 | 556: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
27 | EW |
4  | E | 3 | +1 |
-450 | 26.95 |
| 7 | 556: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
28 | EW |
3  | E | 10 | = |
-400 | 38.69 |