| 1 | 122: K. Orzechowski - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
3  | W | 2 | = |
-140 | -1.62 |
| 1 | 122: K. Orzechowski - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
3  | S | A | +1 |
170 | -2.46 |
| 1 | 122: K. Orzechowski - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
5  | E | K | +1 |
-620 | -4.27 |
| 1 | 122: K. Orzechowski - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
2  | N | 9 | +2 |
170 | -0.08 |
| 2 | 124: K. Wiliński - W. Korbutowicz, 12.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
3  | E | A | +1 |
-130 | 0.37 |
| 2 | 124: K. Wiliński - W. Korbutowicz, 12.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
2  | E | A | +2 |
-170 | -4.63 |
| 2 | 124: K. Wiliński - W. Korbutowicz, 12.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
5 x | S | K | +1 |
650 | -7.51 |
| 2 | 124: K. Wiliński - W. Korbutowicz, 12.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
3  | S | Q | -2 |
-200 | 6.16 |
| 3 | 119: J. Sadowski - Z. Kondyjowski, 16.0, ZP |
25 | NS |
6  | S | 6 | = |
980 | 4.97 |
| 3 | 119: J. Sadowski - Z. Kondyjowski, 16.0, ZP |
26 | NS |
2  | S | Q | +2 |
130 | 1.49 |
| 3 | 119: J. Sadowski - Z. Kondyjowski, 16.0, ZP |
27 | NS |
3  | S | 6 | -1 |
-50 | -3.92 |
| 3 | 119: J. Sadowski - Z. Kondyjowski, 16.0, ZP |
28 | NS |
4  | E | K | -1 |
50 | 4.95 |
| 4 | 121: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
21 | NS |
2  | W | 10 | +2 |
-170 | -1.17 |
| 4 | 121: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
22 | NS |
3  | N | J | +2 |
460 | 1.53 |
| 4 | 121: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
23 | NS |
4  | W | 8 | +1 |
-650 | -2.92 |
| 4 | 121: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
24 | NS |
7 x | W | 5 | = |
-1770 | -10.43 |
| 6 | 125: W. Mateńko - M. Tuziemski, 7.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
4  | E | 6 | -1 |
50 | -4.27 |
| 6 | 125: W. Mateńko - M. Tuziemski, 7.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3 x | N | 6 | +1 |
950 | -12.27 |
| 6 | 125: W. Mateńko - M. Tuziemski, 7.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
5  | E | 8 | -2 |
200 | -3.76 |
| 6 | 125: W. Mateńko - M. Tuziemski, 7.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
7  | N | Q | = |
2140 | -12.34 |
| 7 | 120: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
13 | EW |
5  | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 10.29 |
| 7 | 120: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
14 | EW |
1  | W | 3 | = |
-90 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 120: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
15 | EW |
2  | E | 5 | +1 |
-110 | 5.07 |
| 7 | 120: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
16 | EW |
2  | N | 2 | = |
110 | -0.08 |