| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
2  | S | 4 | = |
110 | 31.54 |
| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
5  | S | K | = |
650 | 40.93 |
| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
2  | N | 10 | +1 |
110 | 58.22 |
| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
4  | E | 9 | = |
-620 | 91.83 |
| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
4  | W | J | -1 |
50 | 58.41 |
| 1 | 437: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
6 | EW |
3  | E | 2 | -1 |
100 | 28.64 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
4  | W | 7 | -1 |
100 | 22.92 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
8 | EW |
3  | E | 8 | = |
-400 | 33.10 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
5  | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 94.68 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
2  | E | A | +1 |
-140 | 66.51 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
4  | W | A | -1 |
50 | 57.94 |
| 2 | 434: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
4 x | E | Q | -1 |
100 | 61.40 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
13 | EW |
3  | N | K | = |
140 | 16.20 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
14 | EW |
3  | E | 10 | = |
-400 | 32.71 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
15 | EW |
3  | E | 6 | +1 |
-430 | 89.38 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
2  | N | 2 | +2 |
170 | 16.59 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
17 | EW |
4  | E | Q | -1 |
50 | 11.40 |
| 3 | 433: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
18 | EW |
3  | E | 9 | = |
-400 | 84.04 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
19 | NS |
5 x | S | A | -4 |
-800 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
20 | NS |
4  | E | A | +2 |
-680 | 19.77 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
21 | NS |
6  | S | Q | = |
1430 | 90.00 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
22 | NS |
3  | S | 2 | +1 |
430 | 68.37 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
23 | NS |
3  | E | 2 | +2 |
-150 | 52.33 |
| 4 | 435: K. Orzechowski - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
24 | NS |
3 x | W | 8 | -5 |
1100 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
25 | NS |
6  | E | 10 | -1 |
100 | 91.35 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
26 | NS |
4  | N | A | +1 |
650 | 87.15 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
27 | NS |
3  | E | A | -1 |
50 | 40.18 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
28 | NS |
6  | N | 10 | -1 |
-100 | 41.46 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
29 | NS |
3  | E | 8 | -1 |
100 | 84.00 |
| 5 | 436: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
30 | NS |
3  | N | Q | = |
400 | 19.09 |