| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
4 x | N | 6 | +1 |
690 | 1.75 |
| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3  | S | A | +1 |
130 | 28.32 |
| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
2  | S | 2 | -2 |
-100 | 66.26 |
| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
3  | W | K | = |
-140 | 88.89 |
| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
3  | E | 6 | = |
-400 | 75.35 |
| 1 | 563: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
6 | EW |
4  | S | 10 | -1 |
-50 | 82.58 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
7 | NS |
2  | S | 5 | = |
110 | 71.68 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
8 | NS |
1  | W | 7 | +3 |
-180 | 32.58 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
9 | NS |
3  | N | 9 | -1 |
-50 | 64.76 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
10 | NS |
4 x | N | A | +1 |
990 | 99.82 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
11 | NS |
2  | S | Q | = |
110 | 79.72 |
| 2 | 568: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
12 | NS |
3  | N | K | +1 |
130 | 70.82 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
2  | N | K | = |
120 | 51.56 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
4  | E | 10 | +1 |
-450 | 27.70 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
4  | S | 4 | = |
620 | 48.96 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
4  | S | 2 | +1 |
450 | 69.79 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
17 | NS |
6  | S | 6 | = |
990 | 93.23 |
| 3 | 565: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
18 | NS |
3  | E | 6 | -1 |
50 | 60.63 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
19 | EW |
4  | E | J | = |
-620 | 66.09 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
20 | EW |
1  | S | 8 | +3 |
180 | 30.80 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
3  | N | 10 | = |
110 | 63.84 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
3  | S | 5 | = |
400 | 4.17 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
4  | E | 2 | +2 |
-680 | 86.63 |
| 4 | 566: C. Wojtaś - E. Kaczmarek, 18.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
4  | W | 7 | +2 |
-480 | 37.85 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
25 | EW |
3  | E | 10 | -4 |
400 | 5.00 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
26 | EW |
4  | W | A | = |
-620 | 72.12 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
27 | EW |
3  | S | 7 | +1 |
430 | 17.88 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
28 | EW |
2  | E | 3 | +4 |
-230 | 3.02 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
29 | EW |
4  | N | 7 | = |
620 | 49.73 |
| 5 | 567: W. Mateńko - H. Pakuła, 9.0, ZP |
30 | EW |
6  | W | K | = |
-920 | 99.90 |