| 1 | 416: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
2  | W | 9 | +3 |
-210 | 17.21 |
| 1 | 416: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
3  | N | J | +1 |
430 | 63.26 |
| 1 | 416: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
1  | W | 3 | +1 |
-110 | 66.44 |
| 1 | 416: J. Linkiewicz - L. Sulżycki, 12.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
4  | S | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 57.41 |
| 2 | 418: T. Mediuch - Z. Kondyjowski, 5.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
2  | E | 7 | +1 |
-140 | 74.31 |
| 2 | 418: T. Mediuch - Z. Kondyjowski, 5.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
4  | N | A | -1 |
-100 | 15.28 |
| 2 | 418: T. Mediuch - Z. Kondyjowski, 5.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
3  | S | J | +1 |
130 | 48.38 |
| 2 | 418: T. Mediuch - Z. Kondyjowski, 5.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
3  | W | 5 | -1 |
50 | 34.49 |
| 3 | 413: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
25 | NS |
5 x | N | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 28.61 |
| 3 | 413: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
26 | NS |
3  | S | 8 | +2 |
660 | 71.46 |
| 3 | 413: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
27 | NS |
2  | S | A | = |
110 | 88.59 |
| 3 | 413: K. Orzechowski - B. Maryńczak, 10.0, ZP |
28 | NS |
2  | N | 10 | = |
110 | 56.22 |
| 4 | 415: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
21 | NS |
2  | S | K | +2 |
170 | 68.69 |
| 4 | 415: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
22 | NS |
4  | N | 5 | = |
420 | 54.19 |
| 4 | 415: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
23 | NS |
4  | E | K | +2 |
-680 | 53.26 |
| 4 | 415: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
24 | NS |
4  | E | A | +1 |
-450 | 34.35 |
| 5 | 420: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
17 | EW |
3  | S | 8 | +2 |
460 | 49.53 |
| 5 | 420: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
18 | EW |
4  | S | 6 | -1 |
-100 | 76.05 |
| 5 | 420: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
19 | EW |
3  | N | 9 | = |
140 | 9.77 |
| 5 | 420: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
20 | EW |
3  | E | 9 | -2 |
200 | 20.23 |
| 6 | 419: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
3  | W | 4 | = |
-110 | 71.63 |
| 6 | 419: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3  | S | K | +2 |
660 | 47.66 |
| 6 | 419: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
3  | W | A | = |
-110 | 53.99 |
| 6 | 419: H. Pakuła - W. Mateńko, 9.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
3  | S | 5 | = |
140 | 21.16 |
| 7 | 414: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
13 | EW |
2  | E | 4 | -1 |
100 | 61.16 |
| 7 | 414: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
14 | EW |
2  | E | 7 | +3 |
-200 | 40.65 |
| 7 | 414: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
15 | EW |
4  | E | Q | = |
-420 | 34.42 |
| 7 | 414: J. Sadowski - C. Wojtaś, 19.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
5 x | N | J | -1 |
-100 | 77.57 |