1 | 54: A. Irzycki - W. Siudek, 0.0, |
7 | NS |
1 | S | 4 | = |
90 | 66.44 |
1 | 54: A. Irzycki - W. Siudek, 0.0, |
8 | NS |
3 | N | 5 | = |
140 | 67.80 |
1 | 54: A. Irzycki - W. Siudek, 0.0, |
9 | NS |
2 | N | 2 | +1 |
140 | 86.29 |
2 | 59: W. Niewiadomski - M. Borewicz, 11.5, MA |
19 | EW |
3 | N | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 74.32 |
2 | 59: W. Niewiadomski - M. Borewicz, 11.5, MA |
20 | EW |
3 | W | A | +1 |
-630 | 89.19 |
2 | 59: W. Niewiadomski - M. Borewicz, 11.5, MA |
21 | EW |
3 | S | A | -2 |
-200 | 76.71 |
3 | 51: D. Neusser - J. Łazarski, 0.0, |
13 | EW |
2 | E | 4 | = |
-110 | 39.04 |
3 | 51: D. Neusser - J. Łazarski, 0.0, |
14 | EW |
1 | E | 3 | = |
-80 | 70.27 |
3 | 51: D. Neusser - J. Łazarski, 0.0, |
15 | EW |
1 | N | 9 | +1 |
110 | 39.86 |
4 | 50: M. Łopaciuk - A. Jonczyk, 9.0, MA |
22 | EW |
4 | S | 7 | -3 |
-150 | 52.70 |
4 | 50: M. Łopaciuk - A. Jonczyk, 9.0, MA |
23 | EW |
1 | E | J | -3 |
300 | 30.14 |
4 | 50: M. Łopaciuk - A. Jonczyk, 9.0, MA |
24 | EW |
3 | N | 9 | = |
140 | 58.11 |
5 | 61: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 6.0, MA |
4 | EW |
3 | S | 4 | +3 |
690 | 29.46 |
5 | 61: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 6.0, MA |
5 | EW |
4 | E | 5 | +2 |
-480 | 60.96 |
5 | 61: J. Bejma - J. Kilanowicz-Bosek, 6.0, MA |
6 | EW |
6 | W | A | -1 |
100 | 3.43 |
6 | 49: D. Płoszaj - E. Szramowska, 3.5, MA |
16 | EW |
4 | E | A | = |
-620 | 75.00 |
6 | 49: D. Płoszaj - E. Szramowska, 3.5, MA |
17 | EW |
4 | S | 8 | -1 |
-50 | 63.01 |
6 | 49: D. Płoszaj - E. Szramowska, 3.5, MA |
18 | EW |
2 | W | 6 | +1 |
-140 | 86.29 |
7 | 56: A. Ziomek - K. Kobyliński, 20.0, MA |
1 | NS |
4 | W | A | = |
-420 | 34.93 |
7 | 56: A. Ziomek - K. Kobyliński, 20.0, MA |
2 | NS |
4 | E | Q | +2 |
-480 | 73.28 |
7 | 56: A. Ziomek - K. Kobyliński, 20.0, MA |
3 | NS |
4 | S | A | = |
420 | 84.24 |
8 | 52: M. Kulikowski - T. Wolfke, 8.0, MA |
25 | NS |
4 | N | J | = |
420 | 32.43 |
8 | 52: M. Kulikowski - T. Wolfke, 8.0, MA |
26 | NS |
4 | S | A | = |
620 | 93.24 |
8 | 52: M. Kulikowski - T. Wolfke, 8.0, MA |
27 | NS |
3 | E | 10 | +2 |
-460 | 4.78 |
9 | 62: M. Olejnik - E. Chmielowska, 2.0, MA |
10 | NS |
2 | S | A | = |
110 | 71.91 |
9 | 62: M. Olejnik - E. Chmielowska, 2.0, MA |
11 | NS |
2 | S | Q | +1 |
140 | 53.42 |
9 | 62: M. Olejnik - E. Chmielowska, 2.0, MA |
12 | NS |
4 x | W | J | -4 |
800 | 97.94 |