| 1 | 503: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
6  | W |  7 | +1 |
-1010 | 71.85 |
| 1 | 503: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
3  | N |  10 | +1 |
630 | 78.63 |
| 1 | 503: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
1 | W | 2 | -3 |
300 | 4.33 |
| 1 | 503: B. Maryńczak - K. Orzechowski, 10.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
2 | W | Q | -1 |
100 | 31.18 |
| 2 | 498: S. Kamiński - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
13 | EW |
3 | S | 4 | -1 |
-100 | 82.23 |
| 2 | 498: S. Kamiński - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
14 | EW |
4 | N | 6 | +2 |
480 | 30.27 |
| 2 | 498: S. Kamiński - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
15 | EW |
3 | S |  9 | -1 |
-100 | 57.51 |
| 2 | 498: S. Kamiński - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
16 | EW |
2 | S | 4 | -1 |
-50 | 90.23 |
| 3 | 500: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
25 | EW |
6 | N | 6 | +1 |
1010 | 35.80 |
| 3 | 500: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
26 | EW |
3 | N | 2 | -1 |
-100 | 74.51 |
| 3 | 500: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
27 | EW |
6 | S | 5 | +1 |
1020 | 68.44 |
| 3 | 500: E. Kaczmarek - L. Błaziński, 23.0, ZP |
28 | EW |
6 | W | 2 | -1 |
50 | 20.64 |
| 4 | 502: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
17 | NS |
4 | N | 3 | +2 |
480 | 47.66 |
| 4 | 502: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
18 | NS |
3 | S | J | +2 |
150 | 57.00 |
| 4 | 502: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
19 | NS |
6 | N | 9 | +1 |
1020 | 92.02 |
| 4 | 502: M. Silski - B. Wiliński, 2.0, NZ/ZP |
20 | NS |
3 | N | Q | +1 |
630 | 56.61 |
| 5 | 497: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
3 | E | 5 | = |
-140 | 81.91 |
| 5 | 497: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
1 | S | 8 | +1 |
110 | 84.77 |
| 5 | 497: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
4 | N | A | = |
620 | 26.65 |
| 5 | 497: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
3 | W | J | = |
-400 | 34.44 |
| 6 | 499: H. Pakuła - A. Kondyjowska, 9.0, ZP |
9 | NS |
6 | N | 8 | +1 |
1010 | 80.00 |
| 6 | 499: H. Pakuła - A. Kondyjowska, 9.0, ZP |
10 | NS |
2 | E | 6 | -2 |
200 | 74.31 |
| 6 | 499: H. Pakuła - A. Kondyjowska, 9.0, ZP |
11 | NS |
2 | E | 10 | +1 |
-140 | 33.66 |
| 6 | 499: H. Pakuła - A. Kondyjowska, 9.0, ZP |
12 | NS |
4 | N | 5 | +1 |
650 | 75.68 |
| 7 | 501: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
5 | NS |
3 | W | Q | +1 |
-430 | 85.16 |
| 7 | 501: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
6 | NS |
2 | N | A | -1 |
-50 | 44.92 |
| 7 | 501: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
7 | NS |
2 | N | 3 | = |
110 | 77.15 |
| 7 | 501: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
8 | NS |
4 | W | 4 | = |
-420 | 20.31 |
