1 | 54: J. Łazarski - D. Neusser, 0.0, |
4 | NS |
3 | E | 8 | +3 |
-690 | 43.84 |
1 | 54: J. Łazarski - D. Neusser, 0.0, |
5 | NS |
6 | E | A | = |
-980 | 6.95 |
1 | 54: J. Łazarski - D. Neusser, 0.0, |
6 | NS |
2 | S | A | = |
90 | 53.42 |
2 | 56: S. Cieślak - A. Rutkowski, 31.0, MA |
16 | NS |
1 | N | Q | -1 |
-50 | 30.82 |
2 | 56: S. Cieślak - A. Rutkowski, 31.0, MA |
17 | NS |
2 | E | 8 | -2 |
100 | 19.18 |
2 | 56: S. Cieślak - A. Rutkowski, 31.0, MA |
18 | NS |
1 | N | J | +1 |
110 | 31.51 |
3 | 55: M. Düm - A. Musiał, 6.5, MA |
13 | NS |
3 | W | 8 | -1 |
100 | 56.85 |
3 | 55: M. Düm - A. Musiał, 6.5, MA |
14 | NS |
4 | W | K | = |
-130 | 55.48 |
3 | 55: M. Düm - A. Musiał, 6.5, MA |
15 | NS |
1 | S | 7 | +3 |
130 | 67.12 |
4 | 61: A. Brusikiewicz - D. Kołodziejczak, 0.0, |
25 | EW |
3 | N | 3 | +1 |
430 | 46.53 |
4 | 61: A. Brusikiewicz - D. Kołodziejczak, 0.0, |
26 | EW |
4 | S | 6 | -1 |
-100 | 66.66 |
4 | 61: A. Brusikiewicz - D. Kołodziejczak, 0.0, |
27 | EW |
3 | N | 7 | -1 |
-50 | 57.11 |
5 | 52: A. Ziółkowski - A. Miller, 2.5, MA |
19 | EW |
4 | E | A | = |
-620 | 30.82 |
5 | 52: A. Ziółkowski - A. Miller, 2.5, MA |
20 | EW |
2 | N | A | = |
110 | 61.64 |
5 | 52: A. Ziółkowski - A. Miller, 2.5, MA |
21 | EW |
1 | W | 6 | +1 |
-120 | 42.47 |
6 | 60: K. Kobyliński - A. Ziomek, 20.0, MA |
1 | EW |
3 | E | 8 | +1 |
-430 | 34.93 |
6 | 60: K. Kobyliński - A. Ziomek, 20.0, MA |
2 | EW |
4 | W | A | -2 |
100 | 23.29 |
6 | 60: K. Kobyliński - A. Ziomek, 20.0, MA |
3 | EW |
4 | S | A | = |
420 | 18.49 |
7 | 63: T. Wolfke - T. Sianecki, 3.0, MA/- |
10 | EW |
3 | W | A | +1 |
-170 | 100.00 |
7 | 63: T. Wolfke - T. Sianecki, 3.0, MA/- |
11 | EW |
1 | S | 9 | -1 |
-50 | 64.38 |
7 | 63: T. Wolfke - T. Sianecki, 3.0, MA/- |
12 | EW |
4 | W | 8 | +1 |
-450 | 6.16 |
8 | 51: A. Jonczyk - K. Sokół, 8.0, MA |
22 | EW |
1 | S | A | +1 |
110 | 34.93 |
8 | 51: A. Jonczyk - K. Sokół, 8.0, MA |
23 | EW |
3 | N | 7 | -1 |
-100 | 67.36 |
8 | 51: A. Jonczyk - K. Sokół, 8.0, MA |
24 | EW |
3 | E | 3 | -2 |
100 | 50.00 |
9 | 58: J. Wernik - M. Borewicz, 10.0, MA |
7 | NS |
3 | W | 8 | -1 |
100 | 13.01 |
9 | 58: J. Wernik - M. Borewicz, 10.0, MA |
8 | NS |
3 | N | A | +2 |
200 | 48.63 |
9 | 58: J. Wernik - M. Borewicz, 10.0, MA |
9 | NS |
4 | E | 5 | = |
-620 | 20.84 |