| 1 | 125: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 4.0, NZ/ZP |
17 | NS |
4  | N |  K | = |
420 | 3.71 |
| 1 | 125: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 4.0, NZ/ZP |
18 | NS |
2 | N |  9 | = |
110 | 1.54 |
| 1 | 125: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 4.0, NZ/ZP |
19 | NS |
6 | E | 10 | +1 |
-1460 | 3.44 |
| 1 | 125: B. Tomaszewski - Z. Kondyjowski, 4.0, NZ/ZP |
20 | NS |
3 | W | 2 | -1 |
100 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 120: J. Linkiewicz - M. Żakowicz, 17.0, ZP |
13 | NS |
3 | W |  K | = |
-140 | -6.41 |
| 2 | 120: J. Linkiewicz - M. Żakowicz, 17.0, ZP |
14 | NS |
3 | E | 2 | -1 |
50 | 3.81 |
| 2 | 120: J. Linkiewicz - M. Żakowicz, 17.0, ZP |
15 | NS |
5 x | E | 2 | -3 |
500 | 10.18 |
| 2 | 120: J. Linkiewicz - M. Żakowicz, 17.0, ZP |
16 | NS |
4 | E | 6 | -1 |
100 | 5.89 |
| 3 | 127: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
9 | EW |
4 | N | K | = |
420 | -2.51 |
| 3 | 127: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
10 | EW |
2 | N | 7 | = |
110 | -3.41 |
| 3 | 127: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
11 | EW |
4 | S | 4 | = |
420 | -4.80 |
| 3 | 127: M. Sankiewicz - C. Wojtaś, 12.0, ZP |
12 | EW |
5 x | W | A | -1 |
100 | -4.87 |
| 4 | 124: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
21 | EW |
1  | W | 6 | -1 |
50 | -3.59 |
| 4 | 124: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
22 | EW |
4 | S | A | -1 |
-50 | 1.27 |
| 4 | 124: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
23 | EW |
3 | N | 6 | -1 |
-100 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 124: W. Korbutowicz - K. Wiliński, 12.0, ZP |
24 | EW |
4 | S | 3 | -2 |
-100 | -1.11 |
| 5 | 126: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
5 | EW |
3 x | S | A | -1 |
-200 | 4.00 |
| 5 | 126: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
6 | EW |
1 | S | 5 | -1 |
-50 | -0.41 |
| 5 | 126: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
7 | EW |
4 x | E | A | -2 |
500 | -9.04 |
| 5 | 126: T. Mediuch - W. Mateńko, 5.0, ZP |
8 | EW |
3 | N | 5 | -1 |
-50 | 2.46 |
| 6 | 121: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
25 | NS |
5 | E | J | +1 |
-690 | -1.57 |
| 6 | 121: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
26 | NS |
3 | E | 2 | +2 |
-660 | -3.44 |
| 6 | 121: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
27 | NS |
2 | S | 2 | +1 |
140 | -0.38 |
| 6 | 121: B. Wiliński - M. Silski, 2.0, ZP/NZ |
28 | NS |
3 | E | 2 | +1 |
-430 | -1.14 |
| 7 | 123: S. Kamiński - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
1 | EW |
1 | S | Q | +2 |
150 | -0.49 |
| 7 | 123: S. Kamiński - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
2 | EW |
4 | S | A | -1 |
-100 | 6.95 |
| 7 | 123: S. Kamiński - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
3 | EW |
4 | W | 2 | -1 |
100 | -1.30 |
| 7 | 123: S. Kamiński - E. Kaczmarek, 16.0, ZP |
4 | EW |
6 | W | 6 | = |
-1430 | 3.23 |
